My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2000-11-08 CC
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2025
>
2000
>
2000-11-08 CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2007 2:59:49 PM
Creation date
2/9/2007 12:24:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
330
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />any system. TETRA is in use throughout the world except North America, with many systems <br />fully operational. Pricing for infrastructure and for subscriber radio equipment is relatively low, <br />with top of the line mobile and portable radios reportably priced around $800.00 primarily due to <br />intense competition and high volume production. <br /> <br />Introduction of TETRA radio equipment in the United States has been delayed apparently for <br />two reasons. The first of those reasons is that Motorola holds certain U.S. patents with rights <br />needed to that intellectual information before TETRA radios can be sold in this country. <br />Motorola has so far been unwilling to negotiate rights to that technology, however, it is believed <br />that Motorola will give rights in trade for other rights to other intellectual property that Motorola <br />desires. <br /> <br />The second reason is that there may be a problem with FCC rules in regard to radio electrical <br />characteristics for which a waiver is needed and the FCC has yet to consider that issue. <br /> <br />Operation in the simulcast mode is not possible with TETRA and therefore TETRA is an <br />inefficient frequency user in a system like that needed in the Minneapolis-St. Paul region. It is <br />possible that there may not be enough frequencies to build a TETRA system in this metropolitan <br />regiOn. <br /> <br />Costs to implement a TETRA system in Anoka County are unknown, however, a relatively <br />expensive infrastructure will be needed that will probably result in costs similar to the two <br />800 MHz alternatives described in this report. <br /> <br />TETRA will also mean that the ability to intercommunicate with land mobile radio users in non- <br />TETRA systems will be difficult and expensive to accomplish. <br /> <br />There is a memorandum of understanding signed by four of the European manufacturers of <br />TETRA equipment that is used to coordinate their activities related to the introduction of <br />TETRA technology to the United States and Canada. That group of manufacturers has promised <br />to provide Anoka County with a pro forma TETRA system design with pricing for a stand alone <br />TETRA system serving the county. As of this writing, that design and pricing has not been <br />delivered. <br /> <br />3.4 COST ESTIMATES FOR ALTERNATIVES <br /> <br />3.4.1 Cost Estimates for Items that are Independent of Radio System Alternative Selected <br /> <br />Some items are needed regardless of the radio system alternative selected. They are mobile radio <br />installation, fire radio paging improvements, backup dispatch facility and equipment, test <br />equipment and training, and more law enforcement dispatch center radio operator personnel. <br />Cost estimates for each of those items is discussed in this section of this report. <br /> <br />Ronald Vegemast Engineering, Inc. <br /> <br />-27- <br /> <br />Report: Anoka County <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.