Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mike Black - Royal Oaks Realty - <br /> <br />t <br /> <br />Mr. Black discussed three scenarios to loop the water main under the creek and down Peltier <br />Lake Drive. Royal Oaks is willing to offer the city $50,000 to run utilities down Peltier Lake <br />Drive. Mr. Black predicted the development completion within two to three years. <br /> <br />Councilinember Powers-Rasmussen suggested sidewalks to access the school since there is a <br />concern with safety on County Road 14. Mayor Wilharber discussed sidewalks in and around the <br />development. Mr. Black understood only a collector street required sidewalks. Mayor Wilharber <br />commented running sidewalks from the east side of Centerville Road, connecting to the proposed <br />south road near the school property would avoid safety hazards. Mr. Black confirmed lot 2, <br />blocks 1-8 is the area for the sidewalk location. Mayor Wilharber agreed with Councilmember <br />Powers-Rasmussen on the safety concerns. Nyberg commented, the city may want to consider <br />sidewalks on Peltier Lake Drive if it is reconstructed. Mayor Wilharber suggested waiting until <br />the Informational Meeting to receive the citizens input. <br /> <br />Mayor Wilharber asked for input from the Council. Councilmember Helmbrecht commented, she <br />was fine with running a sidewalk from Centerville Road to meet the trail on the west side of the <br />school property. Councilmember Brenner suggested sidewalks through the development. <br /> <br />Mayor Wilharber asked Mr. Black, "Is the section of sidewalk agreeable with Royal Oaks?" <br />Mr. Black commented it would be agreeable if the city pays for the trail and the city maintains <br />responsibility for the sidewalk maintenance. Mr. Black commented the trail is clearly there to t <br />accommodate people beyond the development and if the city wants sidewalks perhaps the city <br />should pay for it. Mr. Nyberg commented Mr. Blacks wishes were not out ofline. Mr. March <br />commented the least the developer could do is provide the sidewalk. Mr. March recommends the <br />developer put in a sidewalk along the west side of the development. Mr. March continued, <br />requiring the developer to pay for the concrete, sidewalk trail easement to the school property and <br />to the southern stub of Centerville Road is the least the developer could do. Mr. Black <br />commented the request was way out ofline, if the City wants a sidewalk the developer can put in <br />the sidewalk, but the city should pay for and maintain it. Mr. March suggested tabling the issue, <br />although since this is a safety issue, he felt the issue should not be up for debate. <br /> <br />MOTION by Powers-Rasmussen, seconded by Helmbrecht to require the developer to put in a <br />continuous concrete trail way from Centerville Road to the east, following the roadway to the <br />south and down to the school walkway. In addition, the cost will be credited out of the trailway <br />dedication with all overage paid by the developer. Motion carried. <br /> <br />Mr. Black questioned the maintenance responsibility. Councilmember Helmbrecht explained the <br />only city maintained sidewalks are the sidewalks the school has deemed hazardous. Mr. Black <br />asked, "Since the city asked to have the developer pay for it, can the city maintain it?" . <br />Councilmember Helmbrecht commented the city has limited equipment. Councilmember Powers- <br />Rasmussen commented the city has an ordinance which explains property owners have to maintain <br />the sidewalk on their property. Mayor Wilharber asked for further questions. There were no <br /> <br />~ <br />