Laserfiche WebLink
<br />CC Meeting Minutes <br />September 26, 1990 <br />Page 7 <br /> <br />Centerville should they choose to sign a contract with <br />Anoka County. <br /> <br />Motion by Pelton, second by Burgstahler <br />-to table discussion of the 1991 Police Service contract until <br />the OCtober 10, 1990 City Council meeting; <br />-Ci ty staff is directed to contact the Anoka County Mediation <br />Services in hopes that Lino Lakes will participate in a <br />mediation process that would give in roads to dialogue <br />with enough information to be able to make a decision at <br />the OCtober 10, 1990 City Council meeting; <br />aye - Buckbee, aye - Pelton, aye - Burgstahler, aye - Neumann, nay <br />- Haberman; motion carried. <br /> <br />Council member Burgstahler noted that he would like to use this <br />time to gi ve more opportunity to other people in the City to <br />represent their views to the city Council. <br /> <br />1987 street Reconstruction Assessment <br />The following audience members were present and asked questions or <br />expressed concern regarding this issue. <br />Beverly Hughes, 1793 Center Street <br />Donna Erickson, 1548 Peltier Lake Drive <br />Tom Dario, 1573 Peltier Lake Drive <br /> <br />Council member Burgstahler noted the following. <br />-He has been persuaded by Bill Hawkin's, City Attorney, <br />interpretation of the requirements to reassess non- <br />peti tioners, that any reassessment would be at the <br />discretion of the City Council. <br />-He advised now that it is a question if the City should <br />reduce the reassessments of the non-peti tioners. He <br />noted that both sides have valid points. <br />-He suggested three choices. <br />*The City could do nothing and not reassess. <br />*Reassess at an estimated average of reassessments of <br />petitioners to the non-petitioner property owners. <br />*Reassess the non-petitioners at a mid-point. <br /> <br />Council member BUCkbee noted that a reassessment would p~esent <br />potential exposure for litigation to the City. <br />-He would be interested in reviewing a slidi~9 scale option. <br />-He noted that all parties are not going to.. satisfied, but <br />that a sliding scale appears to be a reaitnable approach. <br /> <br />Council member Pelton noted some of the following. <br />-The only way to avoid litigation is to not rea_tess. <br />-It is her feeling that property owners will ..e if their <br />reassessments are not reduced to 100% of the 1>etitioners. <br />-She suggested that if the City does reassess they go with <br />