1994 CC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

325 COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES 326 NOVEMBER 9, 1994 327 PAGE SEVEN 328 329 Public Works Director/Building Inspector, regarding construction 330 of the stairway to 7096 Progress Road. It was noted Ordinance 331 #4, Subdivision 34.02-3 states a landing place or uncovered porch 332 may extend into the required front yard to a distance not 333 exceeding six (6) feet. The landing place at 7096 Progress Road 334 extends ten (10) feet in the front yard. A copy of the 335 information is on file with the Clerk/Administrator. 336 337 Motion by Wilharber, second by Dario that the intent of the 338 variances granted on June 11, 1986 and September 9, 1994 was to 339 include the sidewalk and landing place as illustrated in the 340 sketch prepared by Paul Palzer, Public Works Director/Building 341 Inspector, motion carried unanimously. 342 343 NEW BUSINESS: 344 345 Request for Variance - 1573 Peltier Lake Drive. 346 Council member Dario removed himself from the City Council. 347 348 The City Council reviewed the Request for Variance Report 349 information prepared by City staff dated November 1, 1994 350 regarding Thomas and Kristine Dario's, 1573 Peltier Lake Drive, 351 request for variance. A copy of this information is attached to 352 made a part of this minutes. 353 354 The Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing on 355 November 2, 1994. It was noted that there was no one present who 356 opposed the granting of the variance. 357 358 Motion by Buckbee, second by Wilharber to approve the Request for 359 Variance from Ordinance #4, Section 34.01-3 of Thomas and 360 Kristine Dario, 1573 Peltier Lake Drive, to construct additional 361 living space and deck to a single family home approximately 362 thirty-seven (37) feet from the lake (nine foot rear yard 363 variance) based upon the recommendation of the Planning and 364 Zoning Commission as follows: 365 special conditions and circumstances exist which are 366 peculiar to the land involved and do not result from 367 the actions of the petitioners. The property is 368 lakeshore; 369 literal interpretation of the provisions of this 370 ordinance would deprive the petitioner of rights 371 commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same 372 district under the terms of this ordinance. The 373 neighboring properties enjoy the same setback; 374 granting the variance requested will not confer on the 375 applicant any special privilege that is denied by this 376 ordinance to other lands, structures or building in the 377 same district; 378