My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005-02-01 P & Z
Centerville
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Minutes
>
2000-2022
>
2005
>
2005-02-01 P & Z
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2006 2:42:07 PM
Creation date
9/27/2005 2:46:59 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Centerville <br />Planning& Zoning Commission <br />February 1, 2005 <br />IV. OLD BUSINESS <br />1.All Committee/Commission Joint Meeting with Council February 2, 2005 6:30 <br />p.m. <br />Chair Hanson reminded everyone of the meeting on February 2, 2005 at 6:30 p.m. <br />V. NEW BUSINESS <br /> 1. Ordinance #24 – Animal Owner to Guardian Proposed Amendment <br />Commissioner Wright indicated that most animal interest groups are in favor of this type <br />of change in wording to change the word owner in relationship to the animal to guardian. <br />Commissioner Wright indicated he would like to put the sentence guardian <br />interchangeable with owner. He then said that he discussed it with Deputy Chief Makela <br />and he has no issue with the language change nor does Otterlake Animal Hospital. <br />Commissioner Klennert Hunt asked if Centerville would be the first community in <br />Minnesota to do this. <br />Commissioner Wright indicated that Centerville would be the first in Minnesota. <br />Commissioner Hanzal asked if owner should be left in the definition. <br />The Commission agreed to use guardian/owner. <br />Council Liaison Broussard Vickers indicated that a substantive change needs public <br />hearings but this might not be substantive enough to require the costs associated with <br />public hearings and publishing. She then said that her second question is issues with <br />enforcement changing from guardian to owner but she thinks this is a good idea. She <br />also asked Staff to see if this can be changed without cost to the City. <br />Chair Hanson asked if In Defense of Animalsis a radical animal rights organization that <br />the City may not want to associate with. <br />Commissioner Wright said they are not radical or like PETA. <br />Commissioner Love asked what type of publicity and other organizations support this <br />change. <br />Commissioner Wright listed some including Best Friends, ASPCA, and Friends of <br />Animals. <br />Chair Hanson asked if this would be for just domesticated animals. <br />Page 3 of 7 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.