1992 Rec./Disb./Res. & Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I I I City Council Meeting Minutes June 24, 1992 page three Ms~ Ayde noted that the old current revenue per month in the City of [Center viI Ie is $4,324.80. She further noted that in order to br~ak even, Lake Sanitation would require $4,725.00. This would apvear to indicate that Lake Sanitation was operating at a de~icit of $500.00 per month in 1991 with regard, to the City of Cepterville. Ms. Ayde further noted that Lake Sanitation does ha~e extra chips if the City of Centerville would like to obtain so~e. , Co~ncil member Burgstahler inquired of Ms. Ayde, that if the City ag[rees to the proposal presented, would she come back then and c~ange her mind as was done in the past. M~. Ayde advised that she would not change her mind. N$W BUSINESS R~quest for Variance - 1649 Peltier Lake Drive S~eve Marcello, owner of the property and proposed homeowner of the lot, appeared before the City Council to request that his d~ck be allowed to be constructed 39 feet from Peltier Lake Drive. It appears that the property to the east of the lot has a d~ck 35 feet from the lake and the structure to the west of the l~t appears to be between 42 and 44 feet from the lake. Mr. Marcello has obtained a permit from the Rice Creek Watershed District to build said deck 39 feet from the property line. M~tion by Burgstahler, second by Wilharber to approve the request f~rvariance at 1649 Peltier Lake Drive to construct a deck 39 f~et from Peltier Lake based on the following justifications: special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land involved and do not result from actions of the petitioner. The lot is only 125 feet deep; literal interpretation of the provisions of this ordinance would deprive the petitioner of riahts commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this ordinance. The neiahboring properties enjoy the same setbacks; granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures or building in the same district; the proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or unreasonably diminish or impair established property values within the surround area, or in any other respect impair the public health, safety or welfare of the residents of the city, ~otion carried unanimously.