Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Page Two - City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />June 11, 1986 <br /> <br />Discussion on bid of $75.00 to revamp grader. Maintenance <br />people put hitch on. That's all that is needed for now. <br />Leo Hensel offered to pull it with his tractor if needed. <br /> <br />Discussion on overweight vehicle permits with regard to <br />construction in the Peltier Lake Hills Addition #2 development. <br />Motion by Robischon, second by Fritchie to lift road restrictions <br />on Mill Road, Peltier Lake Drive and Center Street, motion <br />carried unanimously. Clerk will notify Lino Lakes Police <br />Department and Lake Sanitation of change. <br /> <br />NEW BUSINESS: <br />Discussion on amendment to Ordinance #4. Paul Behr, 6415 <br />Joyer Lane expressed his opinion on this matter. The Planning <br />and Zoning Commission recommended the City Coun~l amend <br />Ordinance #4 to include "Contractors Yard" as a permitted <br />use in the Industrial Zone and add its definition to the <br />Ordinance. The Commission felt it fit nicely into the <br />Industrial Zone and helped to clarify the uses in Ordinance <br />#4. <br /> <br />Motion by Robischon, second by Fritchie to amend Ordinance <br />#4 to include "Contractors Yard" as a permitted use in the <br />Industrial Zone; and include its definition as follows: <br />"an area where vehicles, equipment and/or construction <br />materials and supplies commonly used by building, excavation, <br />roadway construction and similar contractors are stored or <br />serviced. The contractors yard includes both areas of <br />outdoor storage and areas confined within a completely <br />enclosed building used in conjunction with a contractors <br />business~ motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />Discussion on Merabella request for variance for lot split. <br />Frank Merabella, 1046 Ohio Street, West St. Paul expressed <br />his opinion on this matter. <br /> <br />The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended the City Council <br />allow the request for variance from Ordinance #4, Section <br />42.02 to separate the west one third of lots 7, 8, & 9 <br />(which run north and south with frontage on Main Street) <br />from lots 10 & 11 (which run east and west with frontage on <br />Progress Road) creating two separate lots. The variance <br />request seems to meet the required standards: <br />- Existing Special Conditions and Circumstances: <br />- lots 10 & 11 run east and west, and the west 1/3 <br />of lots 7, 8 & 9 run north and south <br />- the two are separated by a permanent easement <br />along the north side of lot 10 <br />- there are two sewer stubs - one to the west one <br />third of lots 7, 8 & 9 and one to lots 10 & 11. <br />- Literal Interpretation of Provisions: <br />- other 50' x 150' lots exist and are built on in <br />the City <br />- the unique lot configuration causes hardship to <br />sell as one piece. <br />- Special Priviledges: <br />- other variances have been granted for unique situations. <br />