My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2002-01-09 CC Packet
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2002
>
2002-01-09 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/20/2009 2:34:55 PM
Creation date
4/20/2009 2:33:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
187
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />7. Resolution #01-27 Adopting: 2002 Tax Levv <br /> <br />Mayor Swedberg thanked Council and Staff for all the time and efforts to prepare the <br />budget. He then explained that the City has been scrambling to prepare numbers since <br />there was a delay in receiving the changes from the state. <br /> <br />Motion by Mayor Swedbel1l, seconded by Council Member Travis to keep the <br />property taxes at the 2001 level oUl,210,OOO. <br /> <br />Mayor Swedberg commented that the state took away $126,000 from the City in <br />homestead credit and local government aid that amounts to approximately 11% of the <br />City's budget. He indicated that he is proposing no tax increase because taxes have <br />increased for the last three years. He further indicated that property taxes are rising three <br />times faster than population growth and taxes compared to valuation is increasing by <br />29%. <br /> <br />Vote: Ayes - 2, Nays - 3 (Broussard Vickers/CapralNelson). Motion failed. <br /> <br />Motion by Couucil Member Broussard Vickers, seconded by Council Member <br />Capra to approve Resolution #01-27, approvinl! the 2002 Tax Levv of$I,480,23. <br /> <br />Mayor Swedberg made a point of order questioning if the dollar amount that Council is <br />talking about is the exact same as the preliminary amount passed by Resolution whether <br />this Resolution needed to be voted on. City Attorney Hoeft recommended voting on this <br />Resolution because the first Resolution was a preliminary number and Council had <br />indicated it would take final action. <br /> <br />Council Member Travis indicated he agreed with Council Member Broussard Vickers' <br />comments from the budget discussion. He also indicated that he agreed with Council <br />Member Capra that the issues she had raised were valid. He then commented that he <br />wished it were not so. <br /> <br />Council Member Capra agreed that she wished it were not so as well and then explained <br />that the City had learned that there are past deficit funds that, according to the <br />recommendation of the auditor, need to be taken care of She then explained that if <br />Council did not ask for the maximum levy the City would not be able to payoff old debts <br />and would pass them on to the next Council. <br /> <br />Council Member Nelson commented that she was sitting on the fence on this budget for <br />weeks and had spent a Jot of time trying to stick with last year's levy amounts. She <br />commented that she was concerned with the article a year ago in the Quad Community <br />Press that had said that Centerville was a very highly taxed community. She then <br />commented that the City needed to plan for street repair, to pay off the deficit funds, and <br />for the deferred compensation liability and potential TIF liability. She further <br />commented that she had read a recent article that compared levies in Centerville, Lino <br />Lakes and Circle Pines and Centerville's increase was the lowest of the three cities based <br /> <br />Page 11 ofl7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.