My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2002-08-14 CC Packet
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2025
>
2002
>
2002-08-14 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2009 9:02:51 AM
Creation date
5/13/2009 8:58:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
237
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />City of Centerville <br />July 24, 2002 <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br /> <br />Mayor Swedberg indicated he felt the ordinance needed to specify where the activity is <br />appropriate. He then indicated that he thought the City's intent was to be specific about <br />where these types of activities were to take place. <br /> <br />Council Member Travis indicated that location is addressed in Ordinance #4. <br /> <br />Mr. Wilharber indicated that location is addressed in Ordinance #4 and then said that the <br />adult ordinance addresses specifically where adult business cannot be located but, since <br />body piercing is not an adult oriented business, the adult ordinance does not limit where <br />that type of business can be located. <br /> <br />Council Member Nelson indicated she had a general comment about the section that <br />discusses persons of bad repute and moral character. She then asked who would judge <br />that and how the City would determine that. <br /> <br />City Attorney Hoeft indicated that would be difficult to do. <br /> <br />Council Member Capra questioned how the City would know that a person applying for a <br />license had been denied a license or had one revoked within a one-year period. <br /> <br />City Attorney Hoeft indicated that provision would be for tracking businesses within this <br />community as it would be difficult to track licensure in other communities. <br /> <br />Council Member Capra asked if the City would be notified by the Health Department if <br />there was an issue. <br /> <br />Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated she spoke to the Anoka County Public Health Department at <br />the request of Planning and Zoning and was told that the County looks at tattooing but <br />otherwise would have no reason to go into a salon to monitor body piercing or body <br />branding. <br /> <br />Mayor Swedberg commented that the license is called a business license but he does not <br />believe the City has a business license. He then asked why it would be called a business <br />license rather than a specific license. <br /> <br />Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that other communities use a business license to keep tabs on <br />what is going on in the city. <br /> <br />Mayor Swedberg asked City Attorney Hoeft to look at Page 12 to clarify the intent of the <br />words distinguished and distinct. He then said he wants to have the license called a <br />massage license. <br /> <br />Mayor Swedberg said he felt it needed to be made clear on Page 3 that a health issue is <br />being addressed. He then asked City Attorney Hoeft to look at Page 4. <br /> <br />Page 3 of22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.