My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2002-12-19 CC Packet
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2002
>
2002-12-19 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2009 11:26:33 AM
Creation date
5/13/2009 11:25:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
154
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Mayor Swedberg questioned the lot widths shown on the plat o'f 58 feet and 44 feet. If <br />minimum lot width is 100 feet, he asked why these are so small. Mr. Gonyea indicated <br />the lot width is measured at the homes front setback, not edge of property. <br /> <br />Ms. Judy Coates, 1638 Hunters Trail, stated she moved to Centerville in August from a <br />twin home in Woodbury. She stated her concern about the number of cars and driveways <br />associated with twin homes when children are in the area. If there are three-car garages <br />on the single-family homes and three-car garages on each portion of twin home, traffic <br />can be heavy. She feels this is a problem for the area. <br /> <br />Council Member Nelson asked Mr. Gonyea to speak to the parkland proposed if Council <br />chose to take land. Mr. Gonyea stated it would need to be evaluated, but expressed <br />concern for the parcel Mr. LeBlanc had indicated as a possibility due to water being on <br />three sides of that parcel. He felt this would be an issue to use for children's play area. <br /> <br />Council Member Nelson asked what amount of property would be taken. Council <br />Member Broussard Vickers indicated 10 percent, or 1.5 acres. Mr. Gonyea clarified that <br />it is 10 percent of useable land, and the wetlands are not useable. <br /> <br />Mr. Don Simonson, 7263 Centennial Road, questioned the elevation of 1.ots on each end. <br />He stated that an ice damn on the lake would create a flooding situation for these houses. <br /> <br />Mr. Shimon, 1751 Peltier Lake Drive asked City Engineer Peterson if he had obtained <br />elevation of other problem land. He then stated the land in proposed development is <br />higher than the other property. While there is a holding pond, he is concerned about run- <br />off ending up in abutting property basements. He further stated this issue already exists <br />in other areas of the city and will result in additional lawsuits, which cost the taxpayers <br />money. He asked who could guarantee that the abutting homes will not be affected. Mr. <br />Shimon asked if it was the City Engineer's problem for sigoing off on the plans or the <br />builder's problem. He stated the pond will be partly in his backyard and he wanted these <br />issues addressed, with all the children in the area, before a problem occurs. <br /> <br />Mayor Swedberg stated a decision hadn't been made on who was liable when it was on <br />private property. Some developments like Center Street didn't have a grade when put in. <br />The City does not want to create new problems, and does not intend to push water off on <br />another property. <br /> <br />City Engineer Peterson stated the elevation is 890 feet at the intersection, and the sanitary <br />sewer is 10 feet lower. He stated that except for one house, which is at 889.5 feet, the <br />remaining houses are 892 or higher. <br /> <br />Mayor Swedberg acknowledged that Peltier Road has 'speed bumps' where pipes have <br />floated up. Mr. Gonyea stated that when those properties were built, the ordinances were <br />not the same. He reiterated that approval was contingent on Rice Creek Watershed also <br />approvmg. <br /> <br />Page 9 of2l <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.