Laserfiche WebLink
<br />pulled prior to Council reviewing it. Mr. Porter explained that additional information had <br />surfuced after the motion was made. The Committee wanted to validate that information <br />before the Council acted on it. The information that had surfaced was the expense to <br />construct a soccer field on the church property, renting the property from the Church and <br />what type of involvement/agreement the City has with the Centennial Soccer Club. Mr. <br />Peterson explained that the Soccer Club has not donated an)1hing (monetarily or <br />voluntarily) to the City, and therefore, can't really say much about the fields or the <br />condition of the fields. Mr. Peterson also commented that to relocate the fencing and <br />then turn around and relocate it back, would be very costly and time consumiog. He <br />explained that his original motion was to try to make at least one of the fields (softball vs. <br />soccer) regulation size standards. Currently, neither the softball nor the soccer fields are <br />of regulation standards. He would like to see at least one of them brought within <br />regulation. Mr. Peterson also mentioned that if the softball fields were made to be within <br />regulation standards, more tournaments could be offered, which in turn would generate <br />more money. Additionally, tournaments would be a great source of income for the <br />concession shelter and the concession shelter would be an added attraction for the <br />tournaments. As far as the soccer fields go, both could be made into "Ul 0" (youth under <br />age 10) fields. He is positive two (2) UtO fields will fit into the same location. Mr. Lee <br />commented that if the Parks and Recreation Committee is looking to invest a substantial <br />amount of money into this park this year, they should try to make it as useable as <br />possible. Mr. Walter expressed his concern over loosing an adult soccer field. Ms. Peil <br />agreed with Mr. Peterson and Mr. Lee that the Committee should make the softball field <br />regulation standard, usable by adults, to help generate income. To have two (2) Ul 0 <br />soccer fields would be the best use of the area The following motion was amended as <br />follows: <br /> <br />Motion by Mr. Peterson, seconded by Mr. LeBlanc to recommend to City Council to <br />move the backstop on field #2, and the outfield fencing on field #3, at Laurie <br />LaMotte Memorial Park, per USSSA standards and requirements, with an amount <br />not to exceed 53500.00. Also to establish another UtO soccer field per Soccer <br />Association requirements. Porter, DeVine, Peterson, Peil, Lee - aye. Walter- nay. <br />Motion carried. <br /> <br />Lions Concession Stand <br />The Parks and Recreation Committee elected to no longer refer to the concession shelter <br />as the "Lions" Concession Stand. Since the Lions Club will not be funding the shelter, it <br />should no longer be referred to as the ''Lions Concession Stand". Ms. Lien suggested <br />tabling this item until the City learns if it is awarded the DNR Grant. If the City is not <br />awarded the grant, the concession shelter will not be happening this year at all. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued related to Mr. Bisek's proposal for a "temporary concession stand", <br />and the following motion was made: <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />l _ <br />