My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1993-03-02 Minutes
Centerville
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
1993-03-02 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2010 9:12:41 AM
Creation date
1/5/2010 9:12:38 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
P &Z MEETING MINUTES <br /> MARCH 2, 1993 <br /> PAGE TWO <br /> Motion by Drilling, second by LaMotte to adjourn the public <br /> hearing, motion carried unanimously. Hearing adjourned 7:40 p.m. <br /> REGULAR MEETING <br /> Pursuant to due call and notice thereof the Planning and Zoning <br /> Commission of the City of Centerville held their regular meeting <br /> on Tuesday, March 2, 1993 at the City Hall. Chairperson Tourville <br /> called the regular meeting to order at 7:41 p.m. Present: <br /> Drilling, LaMotte, Welk. Absent: Vermeulen. <br /> MINUTES <br /> Motion by Drilling, second by Welk to approve the February 2, <br /> 1993 meeting minutes, AYE - Drilling; AYE - Welk; AYE - <br /> LaMotte; ABSTAIN - Tourville, motion carried. <br /> OLD BUSINESS: <br /> Possibility of Amending Ordinance 44. Section 34.06 AMOUNT OF <br /> YARD OCCUPIED, <br /> The Planning and Zoning Commission discussed the possibility of <br /> amending Ordinance #4, Section 34.06 AMOUNT OF YARD OCCUPIED. <br /> Chairperson Tourville noted that Gunnar Pettersen, Building <br /> Inspector, has expressed concern regarding the proposed amendment <br /> to increase from twelve (12) feet in height requirement to <br /> sixteen (16) feet in height. Mr. Pettersen expressed that this <br /> may allow some larger buildings on larger lots. Mr. Pettersen <br /> noted that the height is the average of the sidewall plus one <br /> half of the sidewall to the peak of the roof. Mr_ Pettersen <br /> noted that this is based on the Uniform Building Code. <br /> Chairperson Tourville expressed that is seemed to contradictory <br /> to allow the R -4 zoning district to occupy fifteen percent of the <br /> rear yard and to allow the larger lot districts to occupy only <br /> ten percent of their rear yards. Chairperson Tourville suggested <br /> making it fifteen percent across the board. <br /> Commission member Welk expressed agreement with Chairperson <br /> Tourville. <br /> Commission member Drilling expressed that the reason for <br /> separating the R -4 district was to make the present non- <br /> conforming buildings conforming. Commission member Drilling <br /> expressed that he preferred to leave the proposed amendment as <br /> is. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.