Laserfiche WebLink
102 <br />103 Petersen Invoices <br />104 As a bench handout, attached hereto and made a part hereof, Mr. Petersen submitted his monthly <br />105 invoice for administrative and technical services for the period from May 15 through June 18, 2011; as <br />106 well as a supplemental invoice for photo copies (Invoice #2 dated June 23, 2011) in addition to the photo <br />107 copy invoice (dated June 21, 2011) previously submitted. <br />108 <br />109 Motion 11 -06 -06 <br />110 Member Westerberg moved, and Member Miller seconded approval of payment of th onthly invoice <br />111 from Tom Petersen for administrative and technical support services for the period y 15 through <br />112 June 18, 2011, in the amount of $2,700; photo copy invoice dated June 21, 2011 the total amount of <br />113 $225.54; and supplemental photo copy invoice ( #2 dated June 23, 2011) in the of $70.10. <br />114 <br />115 Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Motion carried. <br />116 <br />117 Stowell Invoices <br />118 Motion 11 -06 -07 <br />119 Member Miller moved, and Member Von De Linde secon appro the payment of three (3) <br />120 invoices from Sheila Stowell for recording secretary se ows: Invoice GLWMO 05 -19- <br />121 11 (Regular monthly meeting) in the amount of $257.44; Invoice LWMO 05 -26 -11 in the amount <br />122 of $205.69; and Invoice #SP -GLWMO 06 -07 -11 in the amount of 1 <br />123 <br />124 Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Motion carried. <br />125 <br />126 GLWMO Citizen Taskforce for Governance/F ce <br />127 Chair Eckman led a discussion on options for th a force, eir objective, membership criteria and a <br />128 selection process; and an update from member citi n their finance research to -date, if available. <br />129 <br />130 Objective / Timing <br />131 As moved in previous mee ' s, an ing discu ons and confirmation with Melissa Lewis of BWSR <br />132 on the Public Hearing da or the on Watershed Management Plan, Chair Eckman noted <br />133 that regarding the tim' h ow -up items related to the Plan, Chair Eckman noted that <br />134 the projected task completi for the task force is March 31, 2011 or ninety (90) days after Plan <br />135 adoption, whichever ' later. <br />136 <br />137 Discussion ified th task rce would provide additional due diligence and their deliverable was a <br />138 recomm ation specifi funding options for the Third Generation Plan and potential changes in the <br />139 GL W overnance if termined to be needed; at which time the five (5) member GLWMO Board <br />140 w recomme tion(s) to the cities. However, further clarification was made that the group <br />141 would be force t a more formal commission. <br />142 <br />143 Mr. Petersen ember Miller concurred, advising that their understanding of the concept was for the <br />144 task force to vide research assistance to the GLWMO outside their regular monthly meetings and in an <br />145 effort to provide that assistance in a timely fashion. <br />146 <br />147 Chair Eckman opined that, even if the group was ready to make a recommendation before the timeframe <br />148 had expired, they would wait until the Plan was adopted. <br />149 <br />150 Member Barrett questioned why the task force would not want to make a recommendation before the Plan <br />151 was adopted. <br />152 <br />