Laserfiche WebLink
354 The TAC shall convene at a minimum of two (2) times per year or more as determined by the <br />355 GLWMO Board; and the TAC shall report its findings and recommendations to the GLWMO <br />356 Board as requested for its consideration. <br />357 <br />358 Chair Pro -tem Eckman recognized audience member Len Ferrington for additional comment, with Mr. <br />359 Ferrington expressing his interest for a Technical working committee, primarily consisting of individual <br />360 citizens; however, in reviewing the motion and concurring with the choices for committee membership, <br />361 the other agencies indicated were regulatory for which the Board needs to conform to, and people already <br />362 relied upon by the Board. <br />363 <br />364 Chair Pro -tem Eckman clarified that those agencies and their representatives were not members of the <br />365 standing committee, but would serve as consultants as needed and as applicable. <br />366 <br />367 Mr. Petersen concurred with Chair Pro -tem Eckman, opining that most WMO's included a portfolio of <br />368 state, federal, and local municipal representatives on their TAC's. <br />369 <br />370 Discussion among GLWMO Board members included the number of people anticipated to serve on the <br />371 TAC, with Mr. Petersen advising that the Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District ( RWMWD) <br />372 had thirty (30) people on its TAC, and depending on special interest issues, it was common to have <br />373 representatives from those agencies and having specific expertise on a subject matter attend as requested. <br />374 <br />375 Chair Pro -tem Eckman opined that the membership didn't have to be static, but would fluctuate as <br />376 projects came up. <br />377 <br />378 Chair Pro -tem Eckman recognized audience member Len Ferrington for additional comment, with Mr. <br />379 Ferrington advising that he had previously served as a private citizen on the RWMWD TAC, and opined <br />380 that the mix of people and their representations worked very well. <br />381 When reviewing the proposed membership list, Mr. Ferrington opined that there was not much emphasis <br />382 on integrating private citizens having technical expertise to support the group; and further opined that it <br />383 would be good to balance the input of advice from regulatory agencies with input from the private sector. <br />384 <br />385 Discussion among Board members included individual member input on potential citizens they were <br />386 aware of in each representative community who had special expertise (e.g. Jim Stark, John Shardlow, <br />387 Duane Stenlund); previously- expressed willingness of GLWMO Board member Chuck Westerberg in <br />388 serving on the TAC and his expertise and qualifications to serve on the TAC; limiting tasks of the TAC to <br />389 ensure their ability to function efficiently and effectively on the most urgent needs. <br />390 <br />391 Chair Pro -tem Eckman noted that the GLWMO should retain some leeway in how it structured the TAC; <br />392 however, she noted the most immediate task of the TAC would be the TMDL study to be undertaken yet <br />393 this year. <br />394 <br />395 Member Miller suggested adding another bullet point to the proposed membership list to included <br />396 "private citizens with special expertise" to ensure clarification of the GLWMO Board's intent. The <br />397 makers of the motion concurred with this friendly amendment. <br />398 <br />399 Chair Pro -tem Eckman recognized audience member Edward Roberts for additional comment, with Mr. <br />400 Roberts questioning how the TAC was compensated monetarily; and if the Public Works Directors would <br />401 be compensated for their time and expertise; and if the GLWMO Board's administrative/technical <br />402 advisory would be the Chair of the TAC or paid for his time and services; and whether there would be <br />403 payments to obtain the expertise needed by the GLWMO Board and TAC and how such invoices would <br />404 be funded. <br />