My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_7485
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
07xxx
>
7400
>
res_7485
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:17:20 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 12:15:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
7485
Resolution Title
Ordering the Construction of Improvement No. ST-P-82-28 and Preparation of Plans and Specifications Therefor Under and Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
3/14/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />half way up the road and put in catch basins along the route, <br />readjust the catch basins back at the Pascal intersection, and <br />potentially do some work on catch basins up at the Hamline <br />intersection. I mentioned earlier that the line that serves <br />Har Mar heads northerly from this direction. The streets that <br />are south of Skillman - namely, Shryer, Ryan, etc. - all the <br />way down to Roselawn actually - do not have any storm sewer <br />facilities. The way it is planned in the master plan for <br />these areas to ultimately have storm sewers would be to have <br />that line run up Pascal to the intersection of Pascal and <br />Skillman where it would join the existing line that was put in <br />with the Har Mar development. Because of the fact that there <br />is going to have to be construction along that route at some <br />point in the future, we felt this would not be the appropriate <br />time to improve Pascal, only to see it torn up with the storm <br />sewer construction at some point in the undetermined future. <br />We therefore did not include that as part of this recommended <br />project. The proposed roadway along Skillman would be <br />centered in the right-of-way, 32 feet wide, typical seven ton <br />residential that you've heard so many times. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN KEHR: Charlie, I'd like to ask you a question. <br />You said you were going to run that pipe about half way <br />through to Hamline. Why don't you run it all the way through? <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: Because it's felt that having the water <br />run 300 or 400 feet along the gutter is a reasonable distance for <br />the water to run and be picked up. You wouldn't have such <br />severe amounts of water - it would be running so fast that <br />it would be out of the gutter. We thought we would be able <br />to contain the water for that distance, before it was picked <br />up by the catch basins. You could carry it farther - it <br />would simply be a higher cost. We were trying to minimize <br />the costs as much as possible. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: Is the water flowing from 1400 west and <br />from 1400 east to Hamline? <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: No, the split is roughly between 1366 <br />and 1358 - approximately. That may not be the exact spot. <br />It's a small amount that goes to Hamline - 300 to 400 feet <br />probably would continue to run west. <br /> <br />MR. POPOVICH: The total cost of this project, Mayor and <br />members of the Council, is $145,904.01, as presently estimated. <br />The street and curbing portion is $113,806.77. If it was 100% <br />assessed, it would be approximately $45.07. Based on the 25% <br />approach, it would be approximately $11.26. The storm sewer <br />portion is $32,097.36. There are 31 units along the way. <br />If it was assessed 100%, it would be $1,035.39 per unit. As <br />you know, storm sewers - we don't assess the full amount. <br />On the basis of 25% of the storm sewer portion, it would be <br />$258.84. So that figure - per unit - plus the front footage - <br />would be the total amount of the assessment. That's the way <br /> <br />-2- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.