My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_7485
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
07xxx
>
7400
>
res_7485
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:17:20 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 12:15:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
7485
Resolution Title
Ordering the Construction of Improvement No. ST-P-82-28 and Preparation of Plans and Specifications Therefor Under and Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
3/14/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />you would calculate it. The general comments I made before <br />would apply here as well. I might also point out that this <br />particular project is not proposed to be consolidated with any <br />of the others - the first four are and the next four - because <br />there's storm sewer involved here, where the others are just <br />street. <br /> <br />ACTING MAYOR JOHNSON: Are there any written statements? <br /> <br />MR. ANDRE: We have one letter from Lester Krogh, 1390 <br />West Skillman Avenue, who is in favor of the project. <br /> <br />ACTING MAYOR JOHNSON: We're now talking about project <br />P-82-28, Skillman Avenue between Pascal and Hamline Avenues. <br />We will open the public hearing. Is there anyone who would <br />like to comment on this project? <br /> <br />MR. HERBERT HALLGREN, 1411 Skillman Avenue: I was just <br />wondering why the storm sewer can't be put in the space to the <br />west of Pascal, running from Skillman to Shryer. Why can't it <br />be put west of Pascal so you can complete that road? That <br />part is City property, as far as I know. <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: Actually it isn't. We've vacated half of <br />the right-of-way. The right-of-way along Pascal - you can <br />look very carefully at the drawing and see that the right-of- <br />way is shown as 34 feet wide. I don't know if that's in <br />front of your home - I don't know exactly where you live - <br />but the typical home has 60 feet of right-of-way. Most of the <br />existing right-of-way is already taken up with the pavement. <br />The pavement is only about three feet away from the existing <br />lot line that we would have toward Har Mar. If we put it west, <br />what we would actually be doing is building it on Har Mar <br />property. Not to say we couldn't, but ~e'd have to go guy <br />the easement. <br /> <br />MR. HALLGREN: That belonged to the City - you donated <br />it to Har Mar. Why? <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: I don't know why. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: Mr. Hallgren, none of us were here then. <br /> <br />MR. HALLGREN: I have another question. A neighbor <br />across the street has arthritis and he was wondering about <br />the accessibility of his home during construction. How long <br />will it be tied up? I suppose the weather determines that. <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: Yes, unfortunately, and the size of the <br />contract and how fast the contractor is and several other <br />things. Routinely, these things take a couple of months - <br />from the time we start to the time we finish. That doesn't <br />mean that you're living in this terrible condition for two <br /> <br />-3- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.