My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_7486
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
07xxx
>
7400
>
res_7486
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:17:22 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 12:15:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
7486
Resolution Title
Ordering the Construction of Improvement No. P-82-21 and Preparation of Plans and Specifications Therefor Under and Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
3/14/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />a block at a time here and there, so I just want to go on <br />record as being in favor of it. <br /> <br />MR. ROBERT GROSE, 2660 Farrington Street: I did take up <br />the Council's suggestion of going around (inaudible) neighbors. <br />In the time allowed, I did have trouble getting to everyone, <br />but I did get to at least some of them (inaudible) and I guess <br />lid like to mention some of the concerns - a couple of them <br />have already been mentioned. One of them is the certain <br />amount of procedure - I think that was sort of mentioned <br />earlier - it was done eight months ago - that's my under- <br />standing of when it went around. The information given out <br />at that time from a pamphlet was a year or two years old. <br />The people that I talked to - some of them had trouble under- <br />standing this. I guess I felt that everybody I talked to - <br />the majority that I talked to - whether they were for or <br />against, as the gentlemen just mentioned - they didn't have <br />all the facts. Even the people I surveyed had some qualms <br />about which way they wanted to go. I just went around and <br />asked if they were for or against - asked them to make comments <br />(inaudible). Again, this may be procedure. I was not aware <br />of this. I did make several calls down to the City Hall <br />here trying to get information. The people I talked to were <br />very helpful, but yet I didn't feel that I had all the methods <br />that you were using for this. Some of us were of the feeling <br />that there would be a vote in our neighborhood (inaudible). <br />A lot of people felt that we were doing a survey. I realize, <br />myself, that you do put a lot of time into something like <br />this. I was able to get to 25 of 31 people. I don't feel <br />that these statistics are necessarily valid, because people <br />didn't have all the facts. Of the 31, 25 were surveyed, 12 <br />were against, and you just heard another one saying he was <br />for it, so we had ten for it, one undecided, we had two that <br />were not applicable - in other words, they did not own the <br />property or they were moving - someone else was moving in. <br />In the last eight months I think we've all seen a neighbor or <br />two that has lost their job - we've got some concerns there. <br />We have young families in our neighborhood, senior citizens, <br />the unemployed - these are all concerns. Again, going back <br />to what information was given out (inaudible) $1,000 cost. <br />For some of us that doesn't sound like too much, but there is <br />that assessment and the other 75% is going to - that has to be <br />paid somewhere. That's going to raise taxes. A lot of <br />people, I don't feel, had that input. <br /> <br />ACTING MAYOR JOHNSON: When the original petition came <br />around, did you sign it? <br /> <br />MR. GROSE: No, I did not. <br /> <br />ACTING MAYOR JOHNSON: Does anybody else wish to speak <br />to this one? <br /> <br />-3- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.