My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_7486
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
07xxx
>
7400
>
res_7486
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:17:22 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 12:15:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
7486
Resolution Title
Ordering the Construction of Improvement No. P-82-21 and Preparation of Plans and Specifications Therefor Under and Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
3/14/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />now or whether I pay for it 15 years down the road. My taxes <br />have gone up $300 in the past two years. When this improvement <br />goes in, my property value goes up, my taxes go up, assessments <br />go up - am I supposed to be held responsible for this when it <br />was misrepresented in the first place? That's the point that I <br />want to get across tonight. <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: I can respond to a portion of that. I'm <br />not trying to defend it, I'm just trying to let the public at <br />least know what happens when someone comes in for a petition. <br />The City doesn't generate them. Someone comes to our counter <br />and says we'd like to have a street done - we give them a <br />petition. We give them a pamphlet that we hope explains a <br />great deal of the process. We also indicate to the petitioner <br />what the prevailing assessment rates have been running. <br />Obviously, without doing a study, we canlt tell you that your <br />assessment is going to be $11.22 a foot. That's impossible <br />without doing a study. This time, for instance, we indicated <br />it would be approximately $1,000 - that would be a good ball- <br />park for someone to think about. It's been our experience <br />that very few people would vote yes if it cost $950.00, where <br />they would have voted no if it cost $1,000. Similarly, very <br />few people change their mind if it's $1,050 instead of $1,000 <br />the other way. Most of the people seem to be able to conclude <br />that they either like it in that kind of a price range or they <br />don't like it. You are correct - there are no specific dollar <br />amounts involved. That's what the study is for - to find the <br />specific dollar amount. <br /> <br />ACTING MAYOR JOHNSON: We don't get to that until we hear <br />from (inaudible). <br /> <br />MR. CRUMPLER: I think for it to be a valid petition <br />that some dollar value should be on the,re, even an estimate, <br />so that the people can figure out on their own how much it's <br />going to cost them. It's not too hard to figure out - with <br />32 houses, $140,000 - how much it's going to cost you. But <br />you have a lot of variables in there so it doesn't cost you <br />that much, yet the people don't know that. So when they vote <br />no, they may want to vote yes if they knew to begin with. <br />Then again, they may vote yes and want to say no. <br /> <br />ACTING MAYOR JOHNSON: They do have a rough approximation <br />when they make that decision. Based on the procedure that the <br />City follows, they do have a rough approximation. It's not in <br />detail, but it's fairly close. <br /> <br />COUNCILMfu~ FRANKE: I want to point out - you people come <br />to us for your streets. I don't know who you are or where you <br />are, but somebody came and got a petition, had it signed, <br />brought it in. At that time you had a little thing that goes <br />with it that people can look at (inaudible). We don't know <br />ourselves what it's going to cost until our engineering <br /> <br />-5- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.