My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_7486
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
07xxx
>
7400
>
res_7486
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:17:22 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 12:15:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
7486
Resolution Title
Ordering the Construction of Improvement No. P-82-21 and Preparation of Plans and Specifications Therefor Under and Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
3/14/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />MAN IN AUDIENCE: (Inaudible) if you don't know that's <br />available to you - how do you call for something you don't <br />know about? <br /> <br />MAN IN AUDIENCE: Can the residents vote on it right now? <br /> <br />ACTING MAYOR JOHNSON: The concerned people, as we heard <br />from the Council, made an attempt to be here tonight. May I <br />see a show of hands from Farrington Street of the people who <br />signed the petition originally, who have changed their minds. <br />That signed for it and have changed their minds against. <br />Has anybody changed the other way - signed against originally <br />and is now for it? <br /> <br />MR. RICHARD KOHNEN, 2708 Farrington Street: My only <br />question is - if that feasibility study is available to the <br />Council, why can't it not also be made available, by mail, to <br />the concerned parties? We have a lot of other things coming <br />out of this City to our house under postage stamps and whatnot. <br />Why can't this also be sent to our houses, if it was available <br />in January? <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN KEHR: We received the information from Mr. <br />Popovich this evening. This is the first time that we've <br />received the actual costs. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN FRANKE: No, it's in the feasibility report. <br />We received this on the 18th of January. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: I'd like to address two or three subjects. <br />Number one is the time element. If a petition comes in after <br />the construction season has started, it is quite obvious that <br />we are not going to order work to be done yet that year and <br />take it into October and November and probably get rained or <br />snowed out. Consequently, many petitions come into us in July <br />or August of one year and, historically, we have these hearings <br />at this point in time, allowing us to go to the bidding season <br />for the next construction period. The information on that <br />brochure - as someone pointed out - is not outdated. The <br />Council has not changed its policy. It's written in accordance <br />with that, so it is not outdated. <br /> <br />I'd like to say something else on assessments. lid like <br />to talk about how a City can reasonably and steadfastly keep <br />its finances. I know you're talking to me about taxes, but <br />this City didn't raise its taxes that much. 11m not here to <br />condemn any other units of government, but don't blame it all <br />on us and don't blame very much on us. When the legislature <br />gets through with this next year, that may be another subject - <br />when they take away our City's aids. That may be different, <br />according to what they told us. But right now, this City is <br />not to blame. Throughout the years, this City went through <br />sani tary sewers, it went through water, it 1 S gone through <br /> <br />-7- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.