My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_7486
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
07xxx
>
7400
>
res_7486
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:17:22 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 12:15:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
7486
Resolution Title
Ordering the Construction of Improvement No. P-82-21 and Preparation of Plans and Specifications Therefor Under and Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
3/14/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />It sometimes costs more to keep maintaining these roads than <br />it would to build a new one. What's the life of a new road <br />that we put in? <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: The design life is for a 20 year pavement. <br />We certainly like to think that the pavement is going to be <br />around a lot longer than 20 years. We figure a 20 year pavement <br />life. <br /> <br />ACTING MAYOR JOHNSON: As the economy improves - it won't <br />be with us that much longer - but youlre right - right now the <br />assessments are coming in about 25% below - the bids are coming <br />in about 25% below these estimates. That's been our experience <br />now for about the last year and Mr. Honchell just confirmed <br />that that's where we pretty much are right now. It's a good <br />time to get the work done in that sense. <br /> <br />MR. DONALD HOFSCHULTE, 2752 Farrington Street: I live on <br />the corner of Iona Lane and Farrington. I have a couple of <br />things - I keep adding to them - I wasn't able to get up <br />and say them before. First of all, I donlt think this is just <br />a cosmetic treatment to the area. I think it's a whole lot <br />more than that. Anybody that just considers it cosmetic, I <br />think, is missing the boat. There's some real value there. <br />Also, when Mr. Langer contacted me last summer, I want to clear <br />the air on something because there was a suggestion that <br />possibly the facts were not properly represented. I want <br />everybody to know that they were properly represented. I know <br />Bob Langer - he lived there 18 years, I've lived there 25 - <br />in fact, I think I was the first one on the block. I don't see <br />him all that often, but I'll tell you - he properly represented <br />the facts. He said that it could be $8.00 and it could be <br />$12.00 and more than likely $12.00 - that's the way he put it <br />to me. I don't think I have the figures that he gave me <br />originally, but I do remember the $12.60 figure. I think that <br />he properly represented what he was petitioning for. Insofar <br />as the Mayor's comments on the cost of sending out a copy of <br />the feasibility study - I don't think it's necessary to send. <br />out a copy of the feasibility study to all of the concerned <br />parties, but I do think a post card could be sent out to the <br />concerned parties to tell them that a feasibility study has <br />been made and is available. As far as the bids are concerned - <br />I agree. I think we'd have gotten better bids even six months <br />ago but the timing was such that you couldn't do it then. But <br />I still think we're going to get good bids now. No question <br />about it. <br /> <br />One last comment that the Council may not like - but I <br />have to say it anyhow because I'm standing and I have a chance <br />to say it. I really do think that the Council perhaps could <br />do a little bit more in the way of leading these improvements - <br />in a more palatable way - to the taxpayers in the community. <br />I think that - having backed off of street improvement as we <br />did a number of years back, after getting your fingers burned - <br /> <br />-9- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.