My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2011_0718
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2011
>
CC_Minutes_2011_0718
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/5/2011 1:26:38 PM
Creation date
8/5/2011 1:26:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
7/18/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,July 18,2011 <br /> Page 15 <br /> Figure 12 <br /> Mr. Vaughan reviewed this graphic in detail from various area roadways for <br /> 2030; and at the request of Councilmember Pust, specifically reviewed base num- <br /> bers for Josephine Road and County Road C-2 without County Road C-2 being <br /> opened, as defined in the legend for each figure. <br /> Page 20 of the Report <br /> Mr. Vaughan summarized his firm's traffic operations analysis by providing an <br /> overview for 2011 and 2030 p.m. peak hour intersection capacities; with and <br /> without the County Road C-2 connections; and impacts for two (2) key intersec- <br /> tions, as well as impacts to all key intersections. <br /> Mr. Vaughan advised that he had made the point during the open house, and <br /> wanted to reiterate it at this time, that without the connection, there would be a <br /> side street delay at the intersection; and that it would degrade to an unacceptable <br /> level and require mitigation; but could be done incrementally. Mr. Vaughan re- <br /> viewed potential mitigations from a twenty (20) year perspective through striping <br /> the roadway appropriately for left/right turns; or installation of a traffic signal at <br /> that locations for access to the roadway under 2030 conditions. <br /> Councilmember Willmus noted two (2) segments of County Road C-2 not under <br /> discussion: east of Lexington and west of Hamline; and questioned impacts on <br /> those two segments. <br /> Mr. Vaughan advised that those impacts were addressed under Figures 9 and 12 <br /> for 2011 and 2030 average daily traffic projections. <br /> Mr. Vaughan addressed the feasibility portion of the traffic study, which his firm <br /> had been asked to provide one (1) conceptual, not detailed, design providing for a <br /> broad brush stroke for a potential connection put in place and what would need to <br /> be done in the area or across the entire segment to "feather" the edges. Mr. <br /> Vaughan reviewed a profile of the roadway; and areas for fill or elevation, based <br /> on a 30 mph roadway design. Mr. Vaughan reiterated that this is a concept only, <br /> and only one concept; and if the connection were investigated further, there would <br /> be other alternatives for consideration. <br /> City Council/Consultant and Staff Discussion following the Presentation <br /> Mayor Roe thanked Mr. Vaughan and staff for their presentation of the study re- <br /> sults; and advised that the City Council would set an opportunity in the future for <br /> public comment. Mayor Roe recognized the interest of the audience; and didn't <br /> want to preclude their ability to make comments at a future meeting; after which <br /> the City Council and staff would attempt to respond to those questions and com- <br /> ments, in addition to those received at the recent open house. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.