My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_7490
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
07xxx
>
7400
>
res_7490
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:17:28 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 12:15:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
7490
Resolution Title
Ordering the Construction of Improvement No. P-82-23 and Preparation of Plans and Specifications Therefor Under and Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
3/14/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />got time to go out there at 4:30 in the morning and shovel <br />that all back out. They usually put it this high in your drive- <br />way. <br /> <br />ACTING MAYOR JOHNSON: This may be impertinent, but could <br />I suggest that you do this at another time? <br /> <br />MR. WILLIAM HAIDER, 325 West County Road C-2: We've <br />always had a problem on C-2 with traffic - dogs being killed - <br />you get out there and you're going to jump back in your yard. <br />Why can't they put four-way stops on Galtier, Matilda - that <br />will slow traffic down quite a bit. On C-2 you have stop <br />signs. On Galtier there isn't any. Kids come down with their <br />bicycles - they come right on through - you hear brakes <br />squealing all the time. If there was a stop sign there, even <br />these kids could be educated that you have to stop at a stop <br />sign. <br /> <br />ACTING MAYOR JOHNSON: Have there been any traffic <br />studies for that purpose? <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: Not in the last year or so, but there have <br />been studies in the past on C-2. Part of that is how the <br />stop signs appeared on - I think it was Matilda, but I'm not <br />sure - but that one was going to be one way, it was going to <br />be another way - we went back and forth and finally came to a <br />conclusion. Unfortunately, it's been our feeling - kind of <br />the prevailing view of those dumb traffic engineers - that <br />putting up four-way stops just to slow down traffic is wrong. <br />You may not agree with that, but they find when you start <br />throwing traffic signs up (inaudible) and not provide general <br />safe traveling conditions - I say general, not just to stop <br />speeders - that what the people start doing is disregarding <br />the stop signs that are there and are really needed and if <br />you don't stop you're liable to get run over because there <br />are 10,000 cars going the other way. Studies have really <br />shown that you need to have certain conditions exist to <br />properly put up stop signs. Those conditions ore not merely <br />for speed control. Stop signs are not to be placed merely <br />to control speed. None of those intersections come even close <br />to meeting the accepted (inaudible) for a four-way stop sign. <br />That's why they aren't there today at least. They have been <br />studied in the not too distant past. <br /> <br />come <br />don't <br />can't <br />them. <br /> <br />MR. HAIDER: They have a playground down there and they <br />down Galtier - cars just go right on through - they <br />lQok. The kids corne down with their bikes and you <br />see them. There are cars parked there - you don't see <br />You always hear brakes squealing. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: Don't we have a two-way stop at least on <br />Galtier? <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: We have stop signs on all streets that <br />approach C-2, except the intersection - you'll have to <br /> <br />-12- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.