Laserfiche WebLink
<br />so the road is eligible for use of state funds, which are only <br />to be used on these special kinds of roadways like this to do <br />some improvements. We have a five year capital improvement <br />program, where we go around and try to rate all the streets in <br />the City and determine an overall program for improving them. <br />Some of you may be interested - this one ranked highest as far <br />as what should be done next. <br /> <br />The roadway - since it's on an MSA system - means that <br />existing single family property - where almost all of you live - <br />are not assessed. Council policy is that single family <br />property not be assessed for these improvements. The only <br />assessment being contemplated - and the reason there is an <br />assessment hearing (inaudible) to let you know it's being <br />considered - is where the apartments are up by Rice Street. <br />That is not a single family location - which I don't have to <br />tell you people - there's more than one person that lives <br />there - so they're going to be getting an assessment, although <br />even there it's not a major assessment per foot. <br /> <br />The roadway - since to qualify for these state aids, <br />however - to make a free roadway for you - means that you have <br />to abide by the state rules. For instance, one of the things <br />that we've been talking about all night is roadways that are <br />32 feet wide, face to face. One of the rules for the state <br />is that the absolute minimum they'll allow is 34 feet, and <br />that's only where there's fairly small traffic volume. To you <br />I'm sure, along County Road C-2, there's a lot of traffic, <br />but compared to a lot of other streets around that are collec- <br />tor streets - it's really not that high. We're proposing that <br />this road be only 34 feet wide - only two feet different than <br />the 32 feet all the other streets are being proposed at. <br />So it's almost identical. <br /> <br />MAN IN AUDIENCE: How wide is it now? <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: It's 28 to 29. It's almost identical to <br />the same width we've been talking about all night for residen- <br />tial streets. It would be one foot wider on each side. The <br />state also says that it has to be a little heavier road, so <br />we'll put a couple more inches of asphalt and make it nine <br />tons instead of seven tons. It will have the same identical <br />concrete curb and gutter on each side and, again, the six <br />inch high curb. The existing street, as I said, is 28 to 29 <br />feet wide. It does have a li~tle wider right-of-way than <br />most streets - 66 feet wide instead of 60. There's another <br />three feet out there on each side. The roadway is in fair <br />condition - at least in some cases. The grades are not too <br />bad except right where it comes down to Western - it's fairly <br />steep right there. The driveways range from almost flat to <br />about 10%. Again, some don't conform to the standards. The <br />yards are fairly typical. I mentioned the traffic - at the <br />western end it's really small - it's kind of residential <br />sized - only 425 cars a day. By the time you get out to the <br />Rice Street end, you're up to about 1375 cards a day, which <br /> <br />-2- <br />