My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-07-21_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Grass Lake WMO
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2011
>
2011-07-21_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/20/2011 1:54:54 PM
Creation date
9/20/2011 1:49:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Grass Lake WMO
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
7/21/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
GLWMO Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) <br />In follow -up to the June 11, 2011 meeting, Mr. Petersen provided a bench handout, attached hereto and <br />made a part hereof, providing his research on TACs' (3) neighboring watershed districts and those <br />results. Mr. Petersen noted that Rice Creek WD does not currently have a TAC; Ramsey/Washington <br />had one primarily for the purpose of relating to rules; the VLAWMO has a Technical Advisory <br />Committee serving as part of the joint powers with authority from their board. Mr. Petersen advised that <br />his findings indicated that TAC's for a WD or WMO Board were basically "blue ribbon committees" <br />established to tackle a certain issue or objective of the organization, with their membership usually based <br />on technical backgrounds and expertise, and were provided some flexibility for tasks. <br />Member Westerberg suggested, in the interest of getting started, the need to approach people to determine <br />their willingness to serve on a core committee; and to explore a hybrid situation to merge a Citizens <br />Advisory and Technical Advisory groups. Member Westerberg expressed his personal concern in loading <br />the TAC with agency -type representatives, rather seeking citizen involvement from citizens having an <br />average level of expertise while also interest in serving on the TAC. Member Westerberg opined that, if <br />the TAC consisted of three (3) interested and committed citizens, in addition to several with technical <br />expertise, it could serve as a core group to get started. Considering the size of the GLWMO and the <br />technical expertise already available through member city engineering staff, future consideration of the <br />composition of the TAC beyond this core group could be given consideration in the future. Member <br />Westerberg opined that he believed most of the expertise could reside in consulting firms and agencies <br />serving as consultants to the TAC, with the citizens appointed to make sure there was an adequate <br />balance; and ensuring that the entire WMO was sufficiently represented. <br />At the request of Chair Eckman, Member Westerberg suggested a core group of three (3) citizens, and <br />two (2) with expertise in water management, for a total of five (5). <br />Chair Eckman asked if Member Westerberg would consider himself as one of those five (5). <br />Member Westerberg advised that he would not consider himself part of that core group of five (5); and <br />would prefer to come up with three (3) citizen representatives from the three (3) WMO lakes. Member <br />Westerberg suggested the following core group: <br />Len Ferrington — Lake Owasso resident <br />Steve Kastner — Lake Wabasso resident <br />Beth Jackson — Snail Lake resident <br />Jim Stark — expert (Roseville) <br />Richard Keisling — lake littoral zone expert <br />Member Westerberg suggested that Mr. Petersen provide administrative assistance for logistics and <br />coordination of the TAC; and related to the Third Generation Plan, the TAC would continue to consult <br />with Ms. Correll with EOR. <br />Chair Eckman questioned if having a citizen TAC precluded creation of a standing core committee. <br />Ms. Correll responded that she didn't think it precluded it, state statute required having both; however, <br />there was no reason why they couldn't be merged, i.e., the CAC and TAC, but she would confirm that <br />with Ms. Lewis of BWSR. Ms. Correll reviewed reference numbers on page 113 of the Third Generation <br />Plan, Section 9.a.c (implementation steps) <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.