Laserfiche WebLink
405 Discussion ensued regarding the BWSR checklist and process for implementing the TAC; intent for the <br />406 joint citizen/advisory standing committee to address any topic assigned by the GLWMO Board; similar <br />407 operations noted by Mr. Schwartz for other WD's in Roseville and their operations, and typical <br />408 invitations to invite staff from member cities to be a part of that group, whether specific items of concern, <br />409 but particularly when it was reviewing any regulatory changes that could impact member cities. <br />410 <br />411 Chair Eckman asked that, when Member Westerberg prepared the GLWMO Board's charge to the TAC, <br />412 that he includes identification of potential projects, as well as noting that appropriate member city staff <br />413 would be part of the group. Chair Eckman also requested that Member Westerberg and Mr. Petersen <br />414 provide an appropriate name for the group that would address its intent, allowing for the TAC to develop <br />415 their thought processes from the name of the group. Chair Eckman suggested that Ms. Lewis with BWSR <br />416 would be a good resource for that discussion and consideration. <br />417 <br />418 Motion 11 -07 -08 <br />419 Member Miller moved, and Member Von Dc Linde seconded authorization to Member Westerberg and <br />420 Mr. Petersen to develop a recruiting process and approach five (5) people for the core group for this <br />421 advisory committee; and create a draft description of the GLWMO Board's expectations for the <br />422 Committee. <br />423 <br />424 Action Step <br />425 Member Westerberg and Mr. Petersen to follow up as outlined with five (5) individuals; and to consult <br />426 with Ms. Lewis at BWSR on an appropriate name for the group. <br />427 <br />428 Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Motion carried. <br />429 <br />430 Task Force Committee Membership <br />431 Chair Eckman noted that previous meeting minutes indicated that names were to be available at tonight's <br />432 meeting; however, due to vacation schedules, she had not completed that charge, but would provide a <br />433 progress report instead. Chair Eckman noted that it was the original instruction from the GLWMO Board <br />434 to have member city mayors recommend a person for the task force. <br />435 <br />436 Chair Eckman advised that the intent for the task force was to have five (5) citizens joint five (5) <br />437 GLWMO Board members to provide due diligence to research governance and finance options needed to <br />438 implement the Third Generation Plan. Chair Eckman clarified that this didn't preclude the two cities <br />439 from analyzing options for the future operation of GLWMO, e.g., having member cities continue <br />440 pursuing special storm water utility fees to support the Third Generation Plan in 2012 and beyond; and <br />441 opined that the due diligence was important to look at possibilities in depth; and to assign the task force <br />442 with vital research to explore thoroughly the data, analyze it, and report back to the full GLWMO Board <br />443 for recommendation to member cities. <br />444 <br />445 Chair Eckman advised that previous discussions suggested that the makeup of the task force consist of <br />446 approaching the mayors of each member city for the names of 1 -2 citizens to approach to determine their <br />447 interest, settling on one citizen representative for each member city; a representative sought from the <br />448 Chamber of Commerce having a business within the GLWMO; a civic - minded individual from the area <br />449 Senior Forum amenable to doing research; and a representative of the area League of Women Voters. <br />450 While sounding easy, Chair Eckman advised that, given the limited size of the GLWMO, it had proven a <br />451 tall order; and finding the right citizens with the appropriate skill set was difficult. <br />452 <br />453 Chair Eckman advised that she and Mr. Petersen had initially developed a two (2) page recruitment <br />454 document, previously copied to the GLWMO Board by e -mail and having received no comments from <br />455 individual members' to -date. <br />9 <br />