My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1999_0419_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1999
>
1999_0419_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2011 12:52:20 PM
Creation date
9/29/2011 12:47:12 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
j. North St. Paul. No parking; across from public works; no community entrance. <br /> k. New Brighton. Good example of community center with play area always busy; <br /> an accommodation and connection of many uses; partnership with Mounds view <br /> School District; replaced commercial with residential. <br /> 1. Maplewood and Shoreview. Dots of civic uses but not connected; typically <br /> suburban; stand-alone buildings. <br /> M. General observations: <br /> find compatible uses to share parking <br /> need to join together the uses- housing and retail with parking at rear; <br /> many centers were not yet part of community <br /> all buildings were not awe-inspiring; in Roseville we use "campus-like" <br /> r <br /> developments; Center Pointe in Roseville is a good example; is there a <br /> community sense of architectural identity? Would buildings in Roseville <br /> be add-ons? <br /> City Center Vision/Ideas from the November meeting included: <br /> Meeting rooms; updated fire/police facility; outdoor facilities; amphitheater swimming <br /> pool indoor; street level mixed use area; updated government complex—state, city, <br /> county; indoor play area; nixed housing; design that blurs distinction between indoor and <br /> outdoor; specific ornamentation to identify Roseville; teen center; service center; multi- <br /> purpose rooms; child care facilities; volunteer organization spaces; performance theatre; <br /> seminar theater; pathways between the facilities; land mark for the center; good path <br /> access to community, human scale, campus setting, trees and topographical changes; <br /> as history center; fitness area; racquetball courts; a safe place to be; hone/garden <br /> education facility; continuing community center,, indoor tennis, carefully planned parking <br /> facilities; major transit facility,possibly LR T, HR; food service/restaurants; conference <br /> facility; kiosk/and select cart vendors; solarium; storage space for center organizations; <br /> statutes and outdoor art; park and recreation center offices; climbing wall, intergeneration <br /> activities/connections; aesthetic continuity in Central Park; goad and decorative <br /> ornamental lighting-, religious facility ; outdoor track- design continuity; government <br /> center schools, CTV, city, cable system; an architectural design that brews from <br /> precedent; passive village square; beauty and barber shops; public access studio; satellite <br /> postal service; design for flexible open ended growth; gallery area; neighborhood <br /> promotion; massage center; community nurse/health services; kitchen/wedding reception <br /> area;technology center—internet access library; child play area; craft castle or room; <br /> signage activities (informational and directional); putting greens; good street accesses; <br /> parkway-tree lined streets with walkways; basketball/volleyball; service-retail; County <br /> Road C as a street; streetscape; monument/gateway signage; flower and butterfly gardens. <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.