My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1999_0125_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1999
>
1999_0125_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/30/2011 11:31:39 AM
Creation date
9/30/2011 11:14:08 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
191
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
An excerpt from the goals and policies section of the Comprehensive Plan is attached. <br /> These goals and policies stress the need for a mix of housing styles and types to meet <br /> the needs of a broad range of citizens. <br /> 24 In 1998, the City conducted a senior housing market feasibility study with the <br /> consulting firm of Health Planning and Management Resources. The proposed <br /> project could meet the identified need for senior housing in Roseville, as revealed by <br /> the study, if the units are affordable and are sold/rented to Roseville residents. (A <br /> summary of the study key finding is attached.) <br /> 3. In conjunction with the application for concept plan approval, the following <br /> documents have been submitted and reviewed by staff in preparation of this report: <br /> Boundary and topographic survey 10/22/9 8) <br /> Preliminary site and grading (11/6/98) <br /> Site plan(11/9/98) <br /> Landscape plan (11/9/98) <br /> Building elevations (11/9/98) <br /> Site profile (11/9/98) <br /> Floor plans including basement garage plan,main level plan, upper levels plan, <br /> and unit plans (11/9/98) <br /> 4. The Comprehensive plan needs to be amended to accommodate the proposed <br /> development on this site. If the planned unit development is approved,the underlying <br /> zoning would be R-3, General Residence District. This district rewires a minirnurn <br /> lot area of 2,000 square feet per one-bedroom unit and 2,800 square feet per two- <br /> bedroom unit, as well as a maximum floor area ratio of o.5. Since the senior dousing <br /> portion of the project would require a minimum lot area of 3.38 acres to meet this <br /> density requirement, the project as proposed on 8.24 acres easily meets these <br /> standards and the criteria within the planned Unl't development provisions. <br /> 5. The topography of the site,the presence of Bennett Fake, and the location of the site <br /> on a corner of two County roadways present development challenges for the site. In <br /> order to meet the 75 foot setback requirement from Bennett Lake, the building has <br /> been placed approximately 15 feet from the edge of the right-of-way for County <br /> Road C. Because of the width of County road C,this should not present a problem <br /> and can be allowed as part of the planned unit development. <br /> 6. The Engineering review of this project indicated that the dedication of an additional <br /> 10 feet of right-of-way will be required aiiong Victoria Street for implementation of <br /> the Ramsey County Master Street plan. Engineering also had concerns with the <br /> grading plan, especially the extensive use of retaining walls, the steep slopes <br /> included, and potential problems with erosion control during construction. In <br /> addition,the retention ponds shown on the grading plan must be redesigned to meet <br /> PF3049-RCA(01/25/99)-Page 5 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.