Laserfiche WebLink
the required setbacks. A 25 foot portion of the building is three feet from the rear <br /> (east) property line a and 46 foot portion is approximately five feet from the side <br /> � <br /> proposed(north) property ro. <br /> line The addition would square off the northeast corner <br /> of the building and would not encroach into these established setback lines. The <br /> • approximately r1,000 square feet of shop space and 5,000 <br /> building �nr111 include <br /> square feat of retail space. <br /> 2.3 suburban True Value Hardware needs to expand its floor area to accommodate <br /> merchandise displays <br /> and additional stock. The applicant has explored several <br /> options for expanding din the business on this site; however, because of the location <br /> of the building on t he property and the interior layout, the only feasible alternative <br /> the building i squaring off in the northeast corner. Are expansion to the front (west) <br /> would result in a los s of parking spaces.aces. An expansion to the south side of the <br /> � <br /> � <br /> building <br /> would also require a variance to the rear yard setback, eliminate an open <br /> space area on the prop e rty, and would not provide Mr. Johnson with the amount of <br /> floor area needed. <br /> 2.4 The building is constructed of concrete block with a brick and wood facade. The <br /> block on the s rear side and portions of the building are painted. The applicant <br /> • construct the addition of concrete block and paint it to match the existing <br /> intends to constru <br /> building. If the build in g addition is constructed as proposed, a four hour fire wall will <br /> be required since the building would be less than five feet from the property line. <br /> Temporal construction and erosion control easements from adjacent property <br /> owners will also <br /> be necessary to allow construction this close to the property lime_ <br /> 2.5 A number of trees are located in the building expansion area, including ash, <br /> mulberry, and elm. The onl y trees of substantial size are the elms; however, other <br /> elms in this area have had to be removed because of Dutch elm disease and it <br /> appears that the remaining ainin elms are also succumbing to this disease. Additional <br /> the townhorne property to the east and will continue to provide <br /> trees are located on p R <br /> a level of screening. <br /> Members of the town home association have expressed <br /> concerns with the loss of these trees and the tack of screening if the building is <br /> expanded. <br /> 'The parking area on the lot which contains 23 spaces, was resurfaced in 1989 <br /> without a building permit. At that time, efforts were made by City staff to bring the <br /> property into comp liance with the applicable requirements (concrete perimeter <br /> curbing and increased setback from the property lines). To date, the required <br /> concrete perimeter curbing has not been installed and the parking lot and storm <br /> water management does not meet the setback requirements along Lexington <br /> Avenue or Rose lawn n Avenue. With any expansion of the building, the parking area <br /> should be brought into compliance with the curbing requirements; however, <br /> � com p <br /> . . applicant to bring the parking area into compliance with setback <br /> requiring the applic � p <br /> result i n a toss of parking spaces. (See attached memo from Jay <br /> requirements will re <br /> Kennedy, 7/27/98.) <br /> P F#3o29- RCA(08124/98) - Page 2 of 7 <br />