1998_0720.ws_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

G:22Qr-I FROH ® n 1 o There e several other twhich will l to x car s late r ni� school dist i - r 'r to the re ;on: n is the calcuiation of prototype fiscal t•�sults fcii- i esul is that can be utilized � � , r t c � rule i *: �s l ��a.i ions conducted ftor the twc) siCenarios-, which sp itxc land uses, Unlike the ' e forecasted rosidentiat'non residanzi al 1wid uses, the prototype �isca� tuna ifs is include, the interaction��th t direct is al r s It i t �p of land 'use. We will calculate the cost for takes a snap shot of who � amii unit as well as the other relev:ani land uses as d isr, a l z�ter_ single-family ra ' w neet the objectives of this RFP is 10 Work with Metro Council staff its Another task which r�1 r � ' ' seal 11'i1 apt ass ssrn nt. i h rl ultant tarn •ill bring its expertise from pping a regional fiscal � - ol to further interpret the Endings of the ten entities to develop a regional throughout the l� and also � � . loth r important task is die preparation of a paper on possible f�Kcal impact sossrriai�t. q r'� r. r _f� Implementation strategies �Y nds ways in -FN Hitch the various ions co�i�+ un hies in the region rrd ht cahance the develop patterns in the Metro area~ *` Technical distance Regarding Scenarios four Each Community and/or T� 1 Provide �� School District. er define the twos na )s „�,, current rrends and the ounci l's adopicd A cr'iti� fLrst step is to Furth - `n term of use categories. Since the Council staff has co mrnu�nit�r leer-1 r� r� f�r�'�r'��rr�� i � � • � specific land use categories '}} n household and employment forecasts, we 1il r�commend the ppui i iiii •,- eacb of the sel Feted co runur atie s find sc ho l disc ici s. For example, there W that should Li�i r 11 , land 1, likely to be at least two residential categories and four nenresidential c ategones. �"ht �� h*• articular community based on their zoni n and use c lassi l�ieat�ar�. atearies a likely to 1 this t ask. .. 1 v v an ef'foa will he made-to evaluate fairly standard Cr'hUeg0nCs. s pal o i - � �, pia � �� in d�tet�r iixin the ernployment aliocatiaiis and land use Carew, r�� provide technical support � assurCp0ons. • r 'id in ul to the list of no-n-fiscal impacts that Council staff w ll As part of this task} a will also p p -study.during the same time frame. otnrriun tics and s howl districts will he w have up to four fiscal - An option for each of the selected r . analysis zones aroagpc subareas. The benefit of having such a fiscal analysis zone �FA ) is to r e duds far services. available and excess capacity of capital facilities allay a farther re�inenier�t in the � the - - - x well as ossi'hl�� rennes. for ��aim pl�, if t� Paul is one of and different impacts on posts as P - ei t. an FAZ nitres there could ire an area within the City where there is d i sin cst m t sa'mp Yn t only `s n revenues w iEW n that �"A , but also reflected tee disin•esim nt; TA would consider not only Ii�1.. �� #�1 i w j ncreased costs incurred- (TA conducted one of the fast disinvestment fiscal analyses for Little Rock). - - - will �s the desirability of the spe�it�� l~As with Council staff and T �rtil dis�us� the pra�ticaliity a� • forecasted those representing t c.onm unit and ar school district- The, hmd use assumptions will be farm tar each Fr A There f ar s it is likely that for some F� experiencing stagnation or d is in��strnen t_ in certai n types of land arse. 'rhe forecasts will he for up to 0 years- tin there may�e decreases • r r� r� r ,tin .an Use Fore asr.� an Narrative ve Work Product Memo � � for the Two Scenarios. T� !`i � Associates, Inc.