My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2002_0422_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2002
>
2002_0422_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/7/2011 12:33:10 PM
Creation date
10/7/2011 11:52:46 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
143
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
O: Carolyn Curti <br /> Communications Specialist <br /> City of Roseville <br /> From: Jerry Freeman <br /> 651-49-3-1293 <br /> 65 1-493- 1295 fax <br /> S ub j e c t: Comments for Odd/Even Election Year Cycle <br /> Meeting for April 10, 2002 <br /> site: April 10, 2002 <br /> I would like my comments and opinions on the above subject added to the discussion and thus the record of the <br /> meeting to be held this evening. <br /> During the campaign for City Council this past fall, I spoke with more than 1000 residents of Roscville asking <br /> them what issues might be important to them. Not one person mentioned to me concern over changing the <br /> election year cycle or that they thought there was a problem with the current election cycle. However, one <br /> frequent issue was how the general public, or voters, could stay informed about the issues being discussed by <br /> the candidates for local office. My concern with going to an even year election cycle is our local voters will <br /> become even less informed about local issues because of the `clutter' from the State or National campaign <br /> ssUes. <br /> After our 2001 City election Al Sands wrote a very interesting letter to the editor expressing his concerns about <br /> the money that was spent by council candidates in that election. The 2001 city election may indeed have been <br /> the most expensive election so far in Roseville's history. His conclusion was that this was too expensive and <br /> there must be a better way to get the candidate's message to the voter. This was during an odd year election <br /> cycle when we did not have to compete with State of Federal election campaign issues. I don't see how moving <br /> the election cycle to even years is going to help this situation. Actually, I believe moving to even years would <br /> i ncrcas,e local spending on elections just to keep the message of local issues at even keel with State and Federal <br /> issues. Going to even years might increase turnout, but the increase in voters might actually be less informed <br /> voters, again, because of the clutter and loss of attention to local issues. <br /> If the Council does decide to change the election cycle to even years, I would respectfully request the council to <br /> shorten, by a one-time ordinance, the length of term of the affected office holders by one year. This would have <br /> the effect of causing an election to take place this fall as a result of these changes. Otherwise, current council <br /> members would have the one time authority to increase their own elected terms by one year without voter <br /> approval. I understand State statute allows for either method, but I believe the voters should decide if they want <br /> to extend terms of elected officials. <br /> These are just some of my comments on this issue. Thank you for allowing me to submit these in writing. <br /> .1 e 1.1-x,, Freeman <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.