Laserfiche WebLink
WORK SESSION AGENDA ITEM NO., 2-B <br /> Memorandum <br /> Date: April 163, 1998 <br /> To: Steve Sarkozy, City Manager <br /> From: Karl Keel, Public Works Director <br /> Right-of-Way Ordinance-NSP Concems <br /> For some time, the City has been considering the adoption of an ordinance, modeled after a <br /> League of Minnesota City's draft ordinance, that provides for the management of utilities within <br /> public right-of-ways. This ordinance was last considered by the Council at its March 23, 1998 <br /> City Council meeting. Final consideration of the ordinance was continued to the April 27, 1998 <br /> meeting to allow tirne to review a resent court ruling in favor of the City of Oakdale upholding <br /> its ordinance requiring NSP to construct new facilities underground. <br /> Attached is a letter from NSP objecting to the following sections of the ordinance. <br /> 1) Subdivision 1 Section 707.23—UndergLoundina ftuirernents <br /> The current ordinance requires that all new facilities be constructed underground. NSP <br /> feels that this requirement is exceptionally onerous and would result in undue cost to <br /> TSP. NSP has indicated that they would charge all undergrounding costs in Roseville <br /> directly to Roseville customers. <br /> Recently, this very issue was tested in a court case between the City of Oakdale and NSP. <br /> The judge in this case ruled that Oakdale's new ordinance requiring undergrounding is <br /> legal. while the court did not specifically address how the cost of undergrounding was to <br /> be recouped, one could infer from the judgies opinion that the undergrounding costs in <br /> Oakdale should be spread across the entire NSP customer base and not charged directly <br /> to Oakdale.NSP has indicated that they will appeals this decision. The City attorney has <br /> indicated that NSP's appeal has some validity and that NSP may prevail on appeal. <br /> Currently, Roseville's subdivision ordinance requires that all new utilities serving new <br /> residential developments be placed underground. The cost for undergrounding in this <br /> case is paid for by the residential developer and by a monthly utility bill surcharge <br /> against new homeowners. The question before the council is should all new <br /> developments, including commercial development, be wed by underground electric. <br /> Three undergrounding options are presented in the attached language. <br />