My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1998_0209_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1998
>
1998_0209_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2011 10:32:11 AM
Creation date
10/11/2011 10:18:26 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
140
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4. The overall density of the project (30 units on 2.97 acres) will not exceed <br /> medium density residential standards (4-10 units per acre); however, the <br /> units will be clustered in one three-story 30 unit building rather than in <br /> townhornes. In addition, the clustering of the units in one building presents <br /> the advantage of needing only one access point on county Road C2 and no <br /> access points on Trunk Highway 88. <br /> b. The project will have minimal traffic impacts on the surrounding roadways. <br /> County Road C2 has a forecasted average daily traffic count (ADT) of 1600 <br /> in 2010 (west of Highway 8 8) and Highway 88 has a forecasted A DT of <br /> 1 3,700. Phase I of project as proposed is expected to generate a maximum <br /> of Zoo to 250 vehicle trips per day. The new signal at County Road C2 and <br /> Highway 88 will benefit residents by providing safe ingress and egress to the <br /> property. <br /> 6. The final plat meets the requirements of Section 1102 of the city Code. The <br /> proposed name of the subdivision is Roseville Commons, which does not <br /> duplicate the name of any plat previously recorded in Ramsey County. <br /> 7. The proposed project (final development plan and final plat) as proposed is <br /> in harmo,i} with the general purpose and intent of the City's Comprehensive <br /> Plan and Title 10 of the City Code (Zoning). <br /> 8. The proposed project (final development plan and final plat) will not <br /> adversely affect the public health, safety, or general welfare. <br /> 4,0 STAFF RECOKMENDATION <br /> 4.1 Based on the findings outlined in Section 3.1 of this report, staff recommends the <br /> following: <br /> . Approve the final plat for Roseville Commons, subject to the subdivision <br /> standards included in the Planned Unit Development/Subdivision Agreement <br /> 2. Approve the final development plan for the planned unit development, <br /> subject to execution of the Planned Unit Development/subdivision <br /> Agreement. <br /> 3. Rezone the property from R1, Single Family Residential, to PUD, Planned <br /> Unit Development. <br /> 4. p prove the Planned Unit Development/Subdivision Agreement and <br /> authorize the Mayor and City Manager to execute the document on behalf <br /> of the City. <br /> P F##2891 - RCA(02l09#98) - Page 4 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.