My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1998_0209_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1998
>
1998_0209_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2011 10:32:11 AM
Creation date
10/11/2011 10:18:26 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
140
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 o.1 General Development Standards. The preliminary and final plat of Roseville <br /> Commons, site development plan (including building and improvement setbacks), <br /> grading plan, utility servicing plan, landscape plan, building elevations, building floor <br /> plans, association covenants, project narrative, and City Street Tree Master Plan <br /> (identified as Exhibits A - K in Section 4.0 of this document), and final land use <br /> designations shall be part of the standards for development of the Roseville <br /> Commons PUD. <br /> Uses. The use of roe within the PUD shall be limited to a three-story o unit <br /> �1�. use property� <br /> condominium building with an underground parking garage, and shall be restricted <br /> condo � <br /> tot p p <br /> he parameters specified in the site development plan, building elevations, and <br /> ,tin documents submitted by the DEVELOPER. Where not superseded by <br /> supporting � <br /> more <br /> restrictive requirements of this PUD, the standards of the underlying R-3A <br /> density residential zoning district shall apply, as stated ' Chapter 1004 <br /> (medium ty � <br /> of the Roseville City Code. <br /> esttictive Covenants. Restrictive covenants for ownership and use of this site are <br /> attached hereto as Exhibit 1. The DEVELOPER has indicated that residency will be <br /> restricted to er�ons 5 ears of age and older; therefore, the age limitation shall <br /> rest, p ]� <br /> included herein as a provision of approval. Any future changes to the restrictive <br /> be p <br /> covenants, including but not limited to the age of residency, shall be submitted to <br /> co � <br /> the CITY for review and approval; however} the CITY shall not be a party to the <br /> restrictive covenants. <br /> Building Setbacks. Building setbacks shall a as shorn on the approved site <br /> development to ,Went p lan. Section 1016.16 of the City Code requires a structure setback <br /> of 50 <br /> feet from the wetland boundary and a parking area setback of 30 feet from the <br /> boundary.. As proposed, the west end of the off-street parking area and the <br /> wetland <br /> southwest corner of the buildin g will be set back less than tern feet from the wetland <br /> boundary. The limited buildable area, combined with the required setbacks from <br /> County Road and Highway 88, creates a practical difficulty for the applicant <br /> both ty <br /> cents justification for ranting variances to the storm pond and wetland <br /> and pre � <br /> setback requirements. A variance to reduce the setback of the off-street parking <br /> area a nd building to 10 feet from the wetland boundary, as shown on the site <br /> ent Ian is hereby ranted. In order to mitigate the impacts of <br /> development p y � <br /> encroaching hin into the setback area, stormwater run-off will need to be pre-treated <br /> prior to being discharged ischar ed into the wetland and native vegetation will be required in the areas being filled. <br /> PUD/Subdivision Agreement#(Mendota Homes, Inc.)- Page 6 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.