1998_0112_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

2,5 An existing wetland on the parcel provides a natural barrier between this structure he single family residences directly to the west. While this wetland serves as and t � . for the property, it does present some challenges in site design. The an amenity � p � applicant has been working with the Rice Creek Watershed District to develop a we � wetland mitigation plan, with replacement wetlands being provided at a two-to-one ratio on site. n 1008 of the it Code outlines the requirements and procedures for a .� Section Y planned unit development. 3,0 STAFF CQMATNT 3.1 In reviewing this request, staff made the following findings: 1. The Comprehensive Plan designates the triangular-shaped parcel as Medium Density Residential and that portion of the adjacent parcel with Roseville as High Density Residential. The Comprehensive Plan also specifically addresses the triangular-shaped parcel. Since this parcel is adjacent to single family development as well as a major highway, the most compatible use was identified as a medium density town hone project similar to those nearby in St. Anthony. It is also stated in the Plan that such a use will reduce potential traffic impacts on adjacent residential streets. 2. In conjunction with the application for concept development plan approval, � �� t he following documents have been submitted and reviewed by staff In preparation of this report: * a grading and erosion control plan for Phases I and 11, including layout of off-street parking areas, location of buildings, and delineation of the wetland (dated 11/10/97); * a landscaping plan for Phase I (dated 07/1 1/97); building elevation plans for Phase I (dated 11/10/97); building floor plans for Phase I (dated 11/10/97) 3. T presence resence of a wetland on the property presents site development Rather than filling in the entire wetland and providing challenges. replace meat wetlands off-site, the applicant is proposing to place minimal fill locations and provide replacement wetlands on-site, While this �n o P . alternative reserves the Natural environment as much as possible, it does at p limit the area available for development. Because of the limited buildable the project as proposed will need a variance from the shor'eland area, p � p P setback requirements. Section 1016-16 requires a structure setback of bo et from the wetland boundary and a parking area setback of o feet from feet . the wetland boundary. The west end of the off-street parking area and the southwest corner of the building do not meet these requirements. The limited buildable area, combined the required setbacks from both County RCA(P F#289 1) -01/12/98- Page 3 of 6