1993_1213_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

QUEST FOR COUNCIL ACT I OAT DATE: 12/13/93 ITEM NOo : f� t Department Ap roval: Manager Reviewed: Agenda section Deports and Recommendations Item Descriptions Receipt of petition for construction of Arthur. Street north of existing location Bacgroundoe on November 22, 19931 a petition was submitted by the Ryan Development group requesting consideration for the construction of a second portion of Arthur Street north of the existing segment recently completed north of County Road C. The petition requests consideration for the installation of bituminous street, concrete curb and gutter, drainage facilities, and necessary sanitary sewer and watermain extensions to facilitate the next phase of the Ryan Developments We hav - reviewed the petition for consistency with state statutes The petition meets the requirements of the statute. It should be noted that Ryan controls only 50% of the affected frontage p Therefore, for the. p rod ect to proceed the normal public improvement hearing process must be conducted and a 4/5 vote of the council-will be necessary for the project to be ordered. Policy objectivesi By City policy and state improvement statute! for the p roject to move ahead the City Council must receive the petition and order the preparation of a feasibility study, once the feasibility report has been prepared, the Council can hold a public hearing and consider whether it wishes to order the project. Upon completion of the feasibility report, staff would return to the City Council and have consideration given at that time for scheduling the public improvement hearing. Financial implications: Project costs for the proposed improvement will 6 be detailed in the feasibility report. we anticipate the report will take approximately 60 days to complete and should be available for Council cons ide ration aamet ime in paid Februarys Assuming '�-h,.- . "ro r ect is ordered following a public hearing in late February, plains be completed in approximately 90 days. Bids could be received in may-, contract awarded by June 1, and work started by Zune 15, 1994 , The project could be completed on 'or about September 11 1994 ,, Staff recommendation: Staff recommends the petition be received and a feasibility report prepared. Because of the current staff work load, the work must be contracted out to a consulting engineer. BRw completed