My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003_1020_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2003
>
2003_1020_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2011 8:05:21 AM
Creation date
10/19/2011 2:56:05 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
178
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5.3 Increase in Property Tax: The proposed town home and condominium development will <br />provide an increase in the property taxes. It is estimated from the United Properties proposal <br />the project will be valued at S 12 to $15 million and generate from $110,000 to $160,000 in new <br />property taxes, about 25% of which comes to the city. <br />5.4 Residents: The Community Development Department estimates that there will be an estimated <br />50 to 70 new residents when fully built out. <br />6.0 PROJECT IMPACTS: <br />6.1 Traffic generation (Source: Institute of Traffic Engineers — Traffic Generation Manual) is <br />estimated to be from 7 to 11 vehicle trips per housing unit or a total of 252 to 396 trips which <br />will enter or leave this residential development from Fulham Street to Roselawn Avenue during <br />a given 24 hour day. The peak PM hour should range from 14 to 20 vehicle trips. This includes <br />vehicles such as the mail truck and garbage pick -up. Roselawn Avenue with 2,200 ADT <br />(2000) trips per day in this location is not at capacity for an "A" Minor Arterial street and can <br />easily absorb the added trips (a "trip" is defined as one vehicle entering or leaving a lot). It is <br />estimated that Roselawn Avenue will have 3,100 ADT by 2010 and 4,200 ADT by 2020. <br />6.2 The City Code requires off - street parking to consist of two spaces for each dwelling unit, of <br />which 1 space will be within a garage. In the case of the United Properties proposal, each <br />condominium unit will have 2 underground parking spaces; 13 visitor parking spaces will be <br />provided in the surface parking lot. Similarly, the town home proposal has a 2 stall garage with <br />each unit and an additional 2 vehicle spaces behind each garage. Visitor parking is contained <br />within a 10 stall surface parking lot. A cross parking easement with the Country Club and/or a <br />proof of parking agreement will be necessary to assure that required parking can be <br />accommodated if required by the City. <br />6.3 Site lighting must be downcast and not shed glare at adjacent properties. The Community <br />Development Department will review a site lighting plan and will work with the Developer on <br />an appropriate style and layout. The developer will discuss options with Xcel Energy for <br />residential street lighting and within the development site. Lighting adjacent to existing <br />residential properties must be down cast. <br />6.4 The placement of mechanical equipment can create visual and noise issues. Given the proposal <br />it is assumed that air conditioning units for the town homes will be placed on the ground. All <br />units for the town homes must be placed on the north or south side of each unit and screened <br />from view. In the case of the condominium, it is assumed that heating, cooling, and ventilating <br />equipment and air conditioning units need to be affixed as wall units to the building facade, <br />placed on the ground, or placed within roof cavities. Those units that are ground units should <br />be centrally placed and screened from view and include reduced noise levels. Should an <br />emergency generator be contemplated for the condominium, the final site plans must indicate <br />the proposed location and the generator must meet all applicable State decibel levels. <br />6.5 The City has adequate sanitary sewer, storm water, and water mains in place to support the <br />development project. The Public Works Department and the Rice Creek Watershed, prior to <br />Final Development Plan consideration, must review and approve all of these detailed plans. <br />PF3471 — RCA 102003 Page 7 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.