2003_1020_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

8.0 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: 8.2 On October 1, 2003, the Roseville Planning Commission held the public hearing regarding the United Properties /Midland Hills request. At the hearing adjacent residents addressed the Planning Commission. The Commission also had questions of the City Planner and applicant. 8.3 Specifically, these questions focused on the Comprehensive Land Use Plan amendment process, timing of watershed review, site lighting, tree removal, landscaping, mass/height of condo structure, traffic generated form project, what happens to County Road B at Trunk Highway 280, overflow parking, and ours of construction. 8.4 The City Planner attempted to answer all of the concerns /questions raised by residents and the Commission, as did Brian Carey (United properties) project developer (see attached minutes). 8.5 The Planning Commission voted (5 -1) to recommend approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment (from LR, Low Density Residential to MR, Medium Density Residential - town homes, and from GC, Golf Course to HR, High Density Residential - condominiums); voted (6 -0) to recommend approval of the Preliminary Plat; voted (5 -1) to recommend approval of the rezoning (from R -1, Single Family Residence District to PUD, Planned Unit Development with an underlying zoning of R -6, Townhome District - town home site and R -3, General Residence District - condominium site; and voted (5 -1) to recommend approval of the Concept Development Plan, subject to the conditions listed in Section 8 of the project report dated October 1, 2003 and the following: a. On site parking being clarified for all users, either via a Proof of Parking agreement or through a cross parking easement with the Country Club. b. Site lighting being reviewed by staff, which lighting is not designed in such a manner to impact adjacent residents. The placement of mechanical units being determined and proper measures taken in design and location to minimize noise and visual impacts to adjacent residents. d. The hours of construction hours and contractor /subcontractor parking being regulated through the PUD. The applicant and City Planner working with the residents on a satisfactory landscape plan that may include off site landscaping. f. The applicant installing drain tile and sump pumps on the properties that he to the east of the condominium parcel. g. The applicant marketing the development to Roseville residents first through the Senior Linkage Program. PF3471 — RCA 102003 Page 9 of 10