Laserfiche WebLink
I House, and be compatible with the general contest and human scale of the <br />2 neighborhood for both architecture design and building materials. The <br />3 condominium proposal must incorporate hip roofs to lower overall height and <br />4 other architectural elements to further enhance each structure and reduce the <br />5 visual mass of the building. A similar exterior architectural treatment must be <br />6 incorporated into the design of the row town homes. <br />7 <br />8 b. The Public Works Department must complete the review and approve of the <br />9 grading, drainage, and utility plans proposed with the General Concept and Final <br />10 Plan submittal. All plans, including the location of fire hydrants and utility <br />11 services connections, require the approval of the Public Works Department. <br />12 <br />13 C. The surface parking lot for the condominium parcel proposes 13 off - street visitor <br />14 parking spaces is adequate, provided a proof of parking agreement is approved. <br />15 <br />16 d. All buildings, tree branches and roots, debris, and any soil contamination (subject <br />17 to MnPCA requirements) must be removed from the site (not burned on the site) <br />18 prior to the issuance of a building permit. <br />19 <br />20 e. Park dedication is required. Staff recommends for this development cash <br />21 payment in lieu of land dedication. The payment amounts to $6,000 for the town <br />22 home site and $30,000 for the condominium site. The park fee is placed in the <br />23 park dedication and redevelopment fund. The Park and Recreation Commission <br />24 will review this before final approvals. <br />25 <br />26 f. Marketing to Roseville residents. <br />27 <br />28 g. An approved (by staff) landscape plan that meets the satisfaction of the <br />29 neighbors. <br />30 <br />31 h. Drainage tiles and drainage plan as approved by staff. <br />32 <br />33 i. Marketing must be to Roseville residents first and through Senior Linkage <br />34 Program. <br />35 <br />36 Chairman Mulder asked for evidence of required easements and agreements at second Council <br />37 meeting. He asked for vertical and horizontal breaks in the building to break up the mass. <br />38 <br />39 Member Traynor said he will vote in opposition because the condominiums are one story too tall. <br />40 He hopes that landscaping can help screen this project. His reservations relate to size of the <br />41 building. <br />42 <br />43 Ayes:5 <br />44 Nays: 1, Traynor <br />45 Motion carried 5 -1. <br />46 <br />