My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003_0331_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2003
>
2003_0331_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2011 10:21:36 AM
Creation date
10/24/2011 9:44:34 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
377
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5.2 l oseville's policy has been to use site - specific Planned Unit Development Zones and <br />Development contracts in redevelopment areas with mixes of uses. Applewood Pointe and its <br />mixed residential uses will a Planned Unit Development zone, specific to this 13.7 acres site. <br />5.3 In early February 2003, the City Planner received the "concept" submittal package for <br />distribution to members of the Development review Committee (DRQ for review and <br />comment. Concurrently, United Properties held a neighborhood meeting regarding the <br />proposed park, its size, and improvements. The "`initial" submittal included among ether items <br />an "L" shaped park, a 3 story senior complex, a dead end public street, and the need for a large <br />retaining wall on the east side of the parcel. At the neighborhood meeting held by United <br />Properties and attended by members of the pans Department on February 7, 2003, residents <br />discussed the "initial 1911 proposal and improvements by creating a larger green area for the park <br />and turning the 3 story structure into a partial 4 story structure. Residents also provided the <br />developer and staff with comments pertaining to the proposed park amenities. <br />5.4 Given the comments from both staff and the adjacent residents, United Properties revised the <br />site plan, cooperative footprint, and building elevations, and submitted these plans for DR <br />review. Because of the DR's initial concerns regarding the retaining wall and its desire to <br />have additional green space for both the park and snow storage, the revised plan has been <br />accepted as the most appropriate design for the Arona site. <br />PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE: <br />5.7 The proposal for A.pplewood Pointe includes the extension o f Arona Street and Terrace Drive <br />within 50 to 55 foot wide dedicated right-of ways. Arona Street is designed as 26 foot wide <br />road and includes designated on street parking areas along the west side of the street. Arona <br />Street would intersect with Terrace Drive creating a three way intersection (two public streets <br />and private drive access). Terrace Drive is designed as a 26 foot wide road that includes <br />designated on- street parking areas for the western half of the street along the south side. <br />Terrace Drive will be improved to connect to the existing Terrace Drive located easterly <br />through both the Terrace Garden and Centennial Garden Apartment's property. There will be <br />no on- street parking allowed on the portion of the Terrace give extension that will connect the <br />new Terrace give and the old Terrace Drive. The Community Development and Public works <br />Departments are current working with the property owners regarding the street extension <br />improvement, which is a separate item, outside of the property boundaries in the Arona/United <br />Properties project. The Council may be asked to approve the use of eminent domain to acquire <br />necessary public easements for the Terrace Drive extension. <br />5.8 The proposal also calls for a public street and right-of-way extending from Arona Street east to <br />provide public street access to the seven single family homes and senior cooperative. The <br />right -of -way would be dedicated at 50 feet wide and have a roadway with a width of 26 feet <br />and parking of the south side, as well as an area to back -up and turn around. (Initially, staff <br />recommended that this roadway be private- however, a private road would increase maintenance costs <br />and require an association for the single family homes, which in turn would make them less affordable. <br />Through the provision of a properly sized/des igned turn- around and access easements, staff has <br />detenrnined that a public roadway is more desirable and cost effective.) <br />PF3457 - RCA Aroma Concept Plan - 033103 Page 3 of 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.