My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-10-25_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2011
>
2011-10-25_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2011 8:51:43 AM
Creation date
10/25/2011 8:47:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
10/25/2011
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 Implementation limited to local streets. A local street is a street under the jurisdiction of <br />2 the City of Roseville. (Re ^''^'°^l^ 9F eelleeteFs) ;de Rtified OR the Reseyollp <br />4 • Implementation of strategies will be funded by a combination of city funds and <br />5 neighborhood participation. <br />6 • Trucks are allowed on all City streets unless otherwise posted (by State law trucks must <br />7 I be allowed on all Municipal State_Aided roads.) <br />8 • The program intends to take a system -wide approach when addressing a neighborhood <br />9 traffic problem. For each project, city staff will determine a logical project boundary that <br />10 will be necessary for the approval process and will help address the issue of <br />11 displacement/diversion to other local streets. <br />12 Implementation strategies will be limited to those local streets where the 85% speed <br />13 exceeds 5 mph above the posted speed limit or where other traffic impacts affecting the <br />14 livability of the neighborhood exists. <br />15 Implementation of traffic management strategies will be in accordance with the <br />16 procedures set forth in this document, and in keeping with sound engineering practices, <br />17 as well as be within the city's available financial and staff resources. <br />18 1 • Implementation of any devices will be consistent with the guidelines in the Minnesota <br />19 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. <br />20 Implementation of strategies shall be consistent with recommended strategies included <br />21 in the Mn /DOT Safety Handbook- JD <br />22 Initial deployments are considered temporary for study purposes and subject to an <br />23 interim review by City staff prior to permanent installation. <br />24 3.0 Traffic Management Background <br />25 The United States has used street closures and traffic diverters dating back to the late 1940s <br />26 and early 1950s, but it was not until the 1970s that Seattle, Washington completed area -wide <br />27 demonstrations of traffic management strategies. Since then, traffic management has been <br />28 continually studied and implemented throughout the United States. Strategies include street <br />29 closures, traffic diverters, speed humps /bumps, signing, increased enforcement and many <br />30 others, but they all are implemented to accomplish one of the following: <br />31 • Modify driver behavior (reduce speed) <br />32 • Modify traffic characteristics (reduce volume) <br />33 • Improve safety for pedestrian and bicyclists} <br />34 Traffic management can be simplified as a tAQ hree step process: (1) identify the nature and <br />35 extent of traffic - related problems on a given street or areal (2) select and implement the <br />36 proper strategy for reducing the identified problem and (3) evaluate effectiveness, accept, <br />37 modify or revert- JD. The traffic management strategies discussed in this document are <br />38 solutions to a narrowly defined set of problems and are not universally applicable or effective at <br />39 1 solving all problems. T"^• Lk traffic management strategy used in the wrong application <br />40 will not improve conditions - it will only increase City costs and may even make conditions <br />41 worse. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.