My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008_0428_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2008
>
2008_0428_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/10/2011 9:06:44 AM
Creation date
11/10/2011 8:44:41 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
*Ramsey County says to allow three weeks for set up, County approval, attorney <br />approvals and printing of ballots. City must use county contracted printing company. <br />* *It would take a minimum of 30 days to recruit, schedule and train judges. City must <br />appoint a minimum of 25 days before election, so need 55 days to schedule. <br />Additional note - If City has to change a voting location,, the City must provide a 90 days <br />notice to the state. It will take at least two weeks to confirm whether all current voting <br />locations are available on August 19. <br />Other Issues <br />Back in 2004 when I researched this issue,, the League of Minnesota Cities had little <br />information. Generally cities with charters may have a provision allowing for a special <br />election,, but not requiring it. I looked at 12 cities in the metro area, and only Minneapolis <br />has specific special election language. Both Fridley and St. Paul had permissive language <br />but did not require a special election. <br />The voters of Roseville twice rejected a proposed City Charter which included provisions <br />calling for special elections. Based on the results I would argue the voters do not want the <br />City to conduct special elections. <br />Joe land y, Elections Coordinator for Ramsey County, has more than 20 years of <br />experience in the elections field. He worked for the Secretary of State's office for many <br />years and is considered one of the most knowledgeable election experts in the state. <br />When I spoke with Joe about the possibility of a special election, one of his first <br />questions was "what public good does it serve to spend $,20,000 for someone to serve <br />four to six months?" <br />Joe then raised three points for the Council to consider. He said he makes these <br />arguments no matter what government entity is considering a special election. <br />• It is much more cost effective to avoid a special election. Elected officials have a <br />responsibility to preserve public dollars. <br />• More people vote during regularly scheduled elections. <br />• We believe it the responsible decision is to hold elections on dates and at places <br />with which the public is familiar. <br />Joe also reminded me that Ramsey County's first priority this summer is preparing for the <br />November election. The County could not give the City the support it did in the 2004 <br />Special Election. <br />I must add that planning and coordinating an election is extremely time consuming and <br />stressful. It's April and I am already preparing for the Primary and General Elections. I <br />do not believe I could coordinate three elections in four months' time. The City would <br />have to hire someone to coordinate this election. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.