My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011_1121_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2011
>
2011_1121_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2011 4:19:33 PM
Creation date
11/17/2011 2:11:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
329
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Council regarding the inspections and whether any complaints were received. The report <br /> found all sites to be in compliance with the stated conditions and the Planning Division <br /> only received calls regarding overflow parking and parking in front of mail boxes. <br /> Concerns from residents have decreased over the years, but the City still does receive <br /> occasional calls and emails regarding park and ride lots. <br /> 5.4 During the review of the application, the Development Review Committee (DRQ had <br /> only one issue that was presented to the group, which was that the buses that are <br /> loading/unloading at the St. Michael's Lutheran Church site should do so off of County <br /> Road B that is, at a location either on the church premises or along one of the three <br /> local roads that surround the church. The feeling is that the park and ride facilities <br /> already increase traffic levels, and buses stationed in the County Road B right-of-way <br /> only add to the congestion and potential confusion. <br /> 5.5 Similar to past years, the City does receive a limited number of calls and emails <br /> mm regarding vehicles partially blocking driveways and mail boxes, or occasional noise- <br /> related issues. One particular issue that arose and that was discussed between the City <br /> Planner and Police Chief was instances of vehicles illegally parking at intersections. This <br /> mm situation can make maneuvering very difficult and obstruct site line. Since the initial <br /> mm INTERIM USE approval for the park and ride lots, the City has always monitored the <br /> situation and worked with the State Fair to resolve any issues that arise, with the <br /> mm exception of prohibiting overflow parking on City streets. That said, the City Planner and <br /> mm Police Chief believe that this situation needs to be monitored more closely in the coming <br /> years and if infractions (e.g., parking in front of driveways or mail boxes or too close to <br /> mm intersections and fire hydrants) continue to occur, additional measures such as no parking <br /> signs may be required at specific locations. <br /> 5.6 Regarding the concern of overflow parking, the notion of limiting street parking to one <br /> side of a street(or prohibiting on-street, overflow parking altogether) has been discussed <br /> in the past; while it seems like a reasonable suggestion, there isn't a practical way to <br /> enforce such a limitation. If fair-related parking is allowed only on one side of the street, <br /> it becomes difficult to determine whether vehicles parked on the other side of the street <br /> belong to fair-goers or to neighborhood homeowners or their guests. And if on-street <br /> parking is prohibited during the fair, the prohibition functionally translates as "you can't <br /> ride the bus if you don't park in the lot;" in this case it would become difficult to <br /> differentiate between nearby homeowners who walk to the site and other folks who may <br /> have driven and parked a few blocks away, putting neighborhood residents in the position <br /> of either having to drive to the site or being turned away with everyone else. <br /> 5.7 Section 1009.03D of the City Code specifies that three specific findings must be made in <br /> order to approve a proposed INTERIM USE: <br /> a. The proposed use will not impose additional costs on the public if it is necessary <br /> for the public to take the property in the future. This is generally intended to <br /> ensure that particular interim use will not make the site costly to clean up if the <br /> City were to acquire the property for some purpose in the future. In this case, the <br /> park and ride facility is a temporary intensification of the use of existing parking <br /> lots and Planning Division staff believes that the INTERIM USE would not have any <br /> mm negative effects to the properties involved that would not occur from the normal <br /> use of the parking lots over the long term. <br /> PF07-017 2011 Renewal RCA 11211 Ldoc <br /> Page 3 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.