My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011_1121_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2011
>
2011_1121_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2011 4:19:33 PM
Creation date
11/17/2011 2:11:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
329
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
b. The proposed use will not create an excessive burden on parks, streets, and other <br /> public facilities. Overflow, on-street parking certainly does affect the streets <br /> surrounding the park and ride facilities. Several people have commented on the <br /> additional traffic and the inconvenience of people parking on the street even, on <br /> occasion, in front of their mailboxes but the majority of these comments also <br /> include a recognition that the short-term inconvenience is easy to tolerate because <br /> of the great value of the park and ride facilities. Planning Division staff believes <br /> that the preponderance of positive comments received about the park and ride <br /> mm facilities is evidence that the INTERIM UsEs do not constitute an excessive burden <br /> on streets, parks, or other facilities. <br /> C. The proposed use will not be injurious to the surrounding neighborhood or <br /> otherwise harm the public health, safety, and general welfare. In the many years <br /> that the park and ride facilities have operated, Planning Division staff has <br /> received no reports of health or safety issues; there was some discussion with <br /> Police Department staff about preventing buses from staging in the County Road <br /> B right-of-way but, in the end, no changes to bus staging locations were <br /> recommended. Noise and trash are concerns and, based on the email <br /> communications provided with this report, seem to have been problematic at one <br /> mm location in particular. But the present application no longer includes the location <br /> that was the source of the most unsupportive comments, and a series of conditions <br /> of approval that have been refined over the years would help to ensure that the <br /> other sites continue to operate in a way that the neighboring property owners find <br /> acceptable. <br /> 6.0 PUBLIC COMMENT <br /> 6.1 In addition to three phone calls from homeowners near as many of the sites, two who are <br /> supportive and one who feels that on-street overflow parking should be prohibited, <br /> Planning Division staff has received several emails, which are included with this report <br /> as Attachment D. <br /> mm 6.2 The duly-noticed public hearing for this application was held by the Planning <br /> Commission on November 2, 2011; draft minutes of the public hearing are included with <br /> 14 0 this staff report as Attachment E. Two members of the public were present to comment <br /> on the application, one of which was a volunteer and frequent patron of one of the park <br /> 14 2 and ride locations who was fully supportive of the renewed approval. The other speaker's <br /> 14 3 comments were also supportive of the park and ride service but provided additional detail <br /> Ill 44 on the on-street parking dilemma; while the influx of vehicles parked on the street is an <br /> 14 5 annoyance, any constraint on the State Fair parking by prohibiting on-street parking on <br /> 14 6 one or both sides of a street or by issuing parking permits to the homeowners and <br /> allowing street parking by permit only fails to solve the problem of scarce on-street <br /> mm parking for guests of the neighborhood residents during the State Fair. <br /> PF07-017 2011 Renewal RCA 112111.doc <br /> Page 4 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.