Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, November 14, 2011 <br /> Page 7 <br /> would remain parks unless the City could replace them in-kind. Mr. Malinen ad- <br /> vised that this letter of request for a right-of-way states that the City intends to re- <br /> place those areas with parkland somewhere else in order to allow the City to move <br /> forward under federal guidelines. Mr. Malinen advised that the City had looked <br /> at acquisition candidates in the Twin Lakes area, one near the ball fields that had <br /> been forfeited, and another off County Road C-2. <br /> As a volunteer having done water testing on Langton Lake over a number of <br /> years, Councilmember McGehee noted the importance of these storm water ponds <br /> in the filtering process for the south basin of Langton Lake, with water quality <br /> continuing to improve as a result, and noted the topography of that area that rapid- <br /> ly slopes down to the lake. Councilmember McGehee questioned if it was possi- <br /> ble to move Twin Lakes Parkway slightly around the filtration ponds so it <br /> wouldn't jeopardize the water quality improvement achieved to-date. As far as <br /> additional parkland, Councilmember McGehee stated that she was not opposed to <br /> the parcel down below, but the water quality in the south and middle needed to be <br /> preserve, since the north basin had already been declared dead as there was insuf- <br /> ficient oxygen to support aquatic life. <br /> Mayor Roe indicated that he didn't think it was staff's intention to change the <br /> ponds. <br /> City Engineer Debra Bloom advised that the basin in question, known as the Ar- <br /> thur Street Pond, was a two (2) cell pond with a narrow channel; and that the <br /> channel had originally been designed to have a road on it: Twin Lakes Parkway. <br /> Ms. Bloom advised that one aspect of the road design was to turn the area into <br /> another storm pond; and assured Councilmembers and the public that when road <br /> projects were designed and subsequently installed they had to meet all water qual- <br /> ity regulations, whether through private or public development. Ms. Bloom ad- <br /> vised that it was not staffs intent to fill it in, but to just have the road go where it <br /> was originally designed as Arthur Road. <br /> At the request of Councilmember Pust, Ms. Bloom confirmed that there would be <br /> a culvert underneath the road to drain the pond. <br /> At the request of Councilmember Pust, Public Works Director Dwayne Schwartz <br /> advised that it was yet to be determined where money would come from for pur- <br /> chase of other land to make up for these two (2) parcels; however, he noted that <br /> there were some opportunities identified in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan, <br /> including the current tax-forfeited parcel that had previously been identified for <br /> acquisition for parkland. Mr. Schwartz noted that a medium Oak Forest had also <br /> been identified to preserve land in that area; with some potential opportunities for <br /> acquisition through redevelopment contracts with developers in that area; and a <br /> potential for remnant parcels that could be designed as parkland in the future. Mr. <br /> Schwartz noted that there were also potential grant funds available for parkland <br />