My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011_0228_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2011
>
2011_0228_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/19/2011 3:16:01 PM
Creation date
12/19/2011 2:32:23 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
265
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Local Rules <br />In Minnesota,, a statutory city council has the power to regulate its own procedures. Home rule <br />charter cities may have similar provisions in their charters. Councils often regulate their <br />procedures through the formal adoption of bylaws. Councils are not required to adopt bylaws for <br />meeting management, but they are highly recommended for the following reasons.- <br />• Rules set common values and expectations for interactions among councilmembers. <br />• Rules can provide structure to a meeting, promoting timeliness and efficiency. <br />• Rules can help resolve conflicts in a positive way that promotes the best interests of the <br />city, rather than allowing conflicts to grow,, potentially disrupting city operations and <br />slowing vital council decisions <br />• Procedural rules are usually provided for in the rules or bylaws adopted by the council. <br />Adoption of council rules may be supplemented by the use of a standard work on <br />parliamentary procedure, such as Robert's Rules of Order. <br />It has been recommended that whatever rules the council adopts, it should follow them. Although <br />the council can vote to change or suspend its rules if the occasion calls for it, it is probably better <br />to stick with the adopted rules except on rare occasions. <br />Suspension of Rules Issue <br />As noted earlier,, one of the basic purposes of parliamentary rules and Council bylaws is to <br />provide order and structure to meetings to ensure that the Council business gets done. Another <br />important purpose is to protect minority members by allowing debate on all issues. While it has <br />only been used locally to extend a meeting beyond the adjournment time set in the Council rules, <br />upon the suspension of rules there is no longer the structure or protection. A simple majority can <br />push through an action item without notice or debate. It appears that is why the suspension <br />action requires the 2/3 vote — to make it more difficult to undertake that action. As noted, it <br />should our only on rare occasions. <br />The point was raised that the adoption of the rules is made upon only a simple majority vote, <br />which could be used to change the rule requiring a 2/3 vote to suspend the rules if a 2/3 vote was <br />unattainable. For that reason,, it may be appropriate that the Council rules be adopted and <br />amended only with a 2/3 vote as well. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.