|
Roseville City Council
<br />June 30., 2011
<br />Page two
<br />The proplo�sed regulatory structme, is being unequally,, arbitrarily, and, capriciously applied.
<br />i i
<br />Recently, the proposed. Regulations were redrafted to exempt one developer/'owner in Twin
<br />Lakes. Ms, adjustment comes without jusfificadon and, highlights a continuing problem with
<br />1,
<br />d Oi
<br />isparate treatment of owners within, this development area.
<br />I enm 1 01 ailing about by the
<br />unfortunately tHs last regulatory exp ent - s only the latest in an ongoin,g fi
<br />41
<br />City of Roseville when "t comes to Twin, Lakes. Being designated part of Twin Lakes has been a
<br />1 0 A'W
<br />disaster for D�BC. The disaster is exempinied by.i
<br />'I
<br />There, have, been, a string, of so called "designated7 developers of the ' City all, of whom
<br />have, touted themselves as the only viable buyer for DBC property over a ten (10)
<br />1 hi,le ctivly
<br />year period. None of them have closed on effe e
<br />my, purchase — all thel w
<br />i
<br />ee Il r the property develom
<br />pent p
<br />oflons.
<br />frzimg
<br />Ul In, 2006 the City chased away, the primary tenant of D�BIC by starting and then
<br />abandoning, a, condemnation. It has been, under-utilized ever sm"cel.
<br />i (P
<br />31. The City has approved a, "developer impacf, fee which "is, estimated to impose a
<br />development fee of up, to, $2.4 mm on the DBIC property. This has substantially
<br />destroyed the value of the DB,C land which, may be worth $3-4 mrn without the fee.
<br />4.1 Mount, Curve Road was recently built (over built?) along the East side of DBC
<br />property. Representatives of thel City asserted this was, a benefit to DBC despite more
<br />When DBC
<br />than adequate access along Cleveland Avenue and County Road, C-i2.1
<br />i
<br />objected to the street, the City declined to put, �a a curb cut to Mount Fidge despite
<br />0
<br />providing', one tol every other, abutting land owner.
<br />a actions, of' the City to, date (much less this recent vro-posed
<br />All considered, the actions and in & &
<br />regulatoryburden) have all but destroyed the value of this private property.
<br />Please elither volte t1iis down or, remove DBC land fro�m Twin Lakes
<br />RM:cp 1 07 F
<br />L
<br />ccum PI Commission of Rosevi"11%
<br />Dorlso Bui"Iding Company,
<br />Thomas Pa,schke, City Planner
<br />11
<br />
|