Laserfiche WebLink
Attachment E <br />WHEREAS,, the City adopted the Twin Lakes Urban Design Principles in 2007 to assist <br />with the redevelopment within Twin Lakes; and <br />WHEREAS,, Section 1005.07 of the Roseville Zoning Code establishes the Community <br />Mixed-Use (CMU) District; and <br />WHEREAS,, Section 1005.07 B provides for the creation of a Regulating Map and <br />Standards establishing development parameters within the District that replace the Twin Lakes <br />Urban Design Principles; and <br />WHEREAS,, the Twin Lakes Sub-Area I Regulating Map and Standards ("Regulating <br />Plan") have been prepared for Sub-Area I of the Twin Lakes Redevelopment Area; and <br />WHEREAS,, the Planning Division held a neighborhood meeting on May 25, 2011 to <br />elicit citizen input into the shaping of the Regulating Plan; and <br />WHEREAS,, on May 25, June 15, and July 5, 2011, the Planning Division and the project <br />consultant met with property owners within Sub Area -1 to seek comments and input on the <br />proposed Regulating Plan; and <br />WHEREAS,, a Public Hearings regarding the Regulating Plan were held on June 15 and <br />July 3, 2011, at which meeting.- <br />a) the City Planner and Planning Division's consultant presented to the <br />Commissioners and the public the proposed Regulating Plan, <br />b) members of the public provided testimony and comment on the Regulating <br />Plan,, <br />c) comments from property owners of property within the Twin Lakes Area were <br />received and considered,, <br />d) correspondence from attorneys for property owners were received and <br />considered'. <br />e) staff reports and documents containing various possible modifications to the <br />Regulating Plan and other background information pertaining to the <br />Regulating Plan was received and considered, and <br />deliberations pertaining to the testimony,, correspondence, documents and <br />other information were conducted by the Commissioners; <br />WHEREAS,, on July 3, 2011, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the <br />Regulating Plan as presented by the Planning Division and it consultant by a vote of 4 in favor I <br />opposed; and <br />WHEREAS,, following the Planning Commission Meeting, the City received additional <br />documents,, reports,, correspondence and other evidence from interested parties pertaining to the <br />