|
Attachment D
<br />5c) If there is an overnight shift change, the related noise must be within the allowable
<br />limits, and must not become a nuisance. Whether an approval of the conditional use does, or
<br />does, not include a requirement about the late-night car doors,, our mechanism for addressing
<br />the problem would be the same: we rely on people informing us, that a problem exists,. This is
<br />not a perfect solution because it allows, a problem to develop in the first place and then
<br />puts, the burden on the neighbors, to let us, know about the issue, but it prevents, the City
<br />from having to hire several additional people to go around and identify potential problems,
<br />before they become actual problems,.
<br />5d) A traffic study hasn't yet been provided. Since I don't know what all goes, in to such
<br />things,, we would have the applicant's, engineers, coordinate with Ros,eville's, engineers, (i.e.,
<br />City and, if needed, cons,ultants,) to make sure that all of the necessary variables, are
<br />factored into the equation.
<br />5e) You might be right that some sort of sign for people who want to travel north on Dale
<br />Street as they leave could be helpful. I'll shop that around here to s,ee if there's, any
<br />reason that shouldn't happen and we can add that to tonight's, dis,cus,s,ion.
<br />And I suspect that lots, of folks, are going to have the sane question about the abrupt end of
<br />section 5.4 of the staff report. For some reason., Adobe appears, to have truncated the
<br />paragraph when it was converted to P format., but here's, how the Word document reads,: "5.4
<br />Pending the res,ults, of a traffic analysis, prepared by the applicant, review of the
<br />proposed assisted living facility against the CONDITIONAL USE standards, and criteria leads,
<br />Planning Division staff to conclude that the use can meet all of the applicable requirements,.
<br />Some of the requirements, (e , provision of open space for the residents,) will necessitate
<br />ongoing verification and many of the DRC-s, comments, pertain to City Code and watershed
<br />requirements, that must be met in order to receive the permits, necessary to begin
<br />construction. Planning Division staff does, recommend that some conditions, be attached to an
<br />approval of the proposed CONDITIONAL USE to ensure that potential impacts, of the assisted
<br />living facility are appropriately mitigated. 11
<br />I hope that helps,.
<br />Bryan Lloyd
<br />Associate City Planner
<br />City of Roseville
<br />651,-792-7073
<br />Bryan .11oyd@ci.ros,eville.mn.us,
<br />-----Original Message-----
<br />From: Eugene Anderson
<br />Sent: Wednesday., June 01,., 201,1, 8:1,0 AM
<br />To: Bryan Lloyd
<br />Subject: Planning, File 1,1,-01,3
<br />Dear Mr. Lloyd:
<br />Reference the conditional use application for 621,-637 Larpenteur Avenue.
<br />My house is at 1,707 Alta Vista Drive, second lot north of this property. I have several
<br />questions, regarding the proposed plan:
<br />1. Paragraph 5.1, d states, that all outdoor recreation occurs, within a secure, fenced area,
<br />and paragraph 5.2 d also refers, to "secured areas, of the facility 11 I can not locate that
<br />outside area on page A1.1, of the site plan. Where will that area be located?
<br />Page 2 of 4
<br />
|