My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011_0822_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2011
>
2011_0822_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2012 1:34:46 PM
Creation date
12/22/2011 12:55:23 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
258
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
`34 POLICY OBJECTIVE <br />35 Shifting election responsibilities to Ramsey County would ensure that Roseville residents have <br />36 the best voting experience while minimizing financial burden on taxpayers. <br />37 This is a contract for one election cycle. Roseville can review the experience following the 2012 <br />3,,,i election and decide whether to continue the relationship in future years. <br />39 Contracting with Ramsey County would provide several benefits, including.- <br />40 <br />°11 0 Puts the responsibility for elections with a County division whose only function <br />42 and purpose is to coordinate and manage elections <br />43 0 Potential cost savings through economies of scale as more communities contract <br />44 with the County, the overhead for each decreases <br />45 0 Provides for consistent budgeting from year to year <br />46 0 Allows staff to focus on key work responsibilities that suffer during election <br />47 seasons <br />48 0 Eliminates sending multiple staff to multiple election training sessions <br />49 0 Provides flexibility in staffing, allowing employees to focus on their primary <br />responsibilities and other duties as assigned <br />2 By shifting elections responsibilities to the County, this would free up a considerable amount of <br />3 staff time to dedicate to records retention,, which ranked a much higher budget priority (970) <br />54 compared to elections (999) in the Priority Based Budgeting that was completed by the Council <br />this spring. <br />56 FINANCIAL IMPACTS <br />57 The proposed contract would be for $,107,500 for the 2011-2012 election cycle. This is a cost of <br />approximately $,4.55 per registered voter in Roseville. <br />59 In 2009 and 2010,, Roseville budgeted $,113,230 for elections. Costs charged to the Election <br />6o account were $, 101,315 for the two years. Roseville also spent approximately $,2,960 for <br />6'i elections' postage that is not included in the budget, nor does it include approximately 4�4�O hours <br />62 that other departments/staff expend helping with elections. This includes staff from almost all <br />63 departments — administration, parks and rec, payroll, police, fire, etc. Based on actual salaries <br />64 and hours worked,, a conservative estimate puts the employee salary cost at $,13,000. <br />65 Under the contract with Ramsey County, the County would incur all costs for election judge <br />66 salaries and training, printing ballots, publication of notices, telephone, transportation,, rental,, <br />67 storage and other costs. <br />64, In addition,, the City would have more than 900 hours of staff time to direct to other essential <br />69 services — more than 500 of the election coordinator's time and more than 400 of other staff's <br />'7 0 time. <br />'7 1 In comparing budgeted costs to this proposal, the biennial costs for outside services and charges <br />'72 would increase slightly, but the cost of City staff time would decrease significantly. <br />'7 3 While the budget will increase slightly, staff time required for elections that is not reflected in <br />74 the budget will offset most of that increase. <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.