My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2011_1205
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2011
>
CC_Minutes_2011_1205
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/27/2011 1:40:35 PM
Creation date
12/27/2011 1:40:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
12/5/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, December 05, 2011 <br /> Page 7 <br /> and timely infrastructure maintenance; and encouraged the City Council to keep that item <br /> in its proposed General Fund budget. <br /> Regarding water and sewer rates, Mr. DeBenedet noted his recent Master's Degree thesis <br /> that studied the City of Roseville's water and sewer system and what needed to be done <br /> to ensure for users of the system that it continued to function well and the lowest long- <br /> term and ongoing cost. Mr. DeBenedet opined that the proposed CIP recommendations <br /> for utility rate increases would keep the system well-maintained and functioning well <br /> over the next 10-30 years. Mr. DeBenedet noted that approximately 75% of the current <br /> infrastructure system was built in the late 1950's and early 1960's and had exceeded its <br /> useful life, with many of the materials no longer even used since the mid-1970's due to <br /> problems encountered or new technologies. Mr. DeBenedet further opined that this pro- <br /> posal for replacement and reconstruction was realistic and prudent, and that it was the <br /> right thing to do. Mr. DeBenedet noted the cost efficiencies in replacing infrastructure <br /> systems in conjunction with street maintenance projects going forward; and asked that the <br /> City Council continue that program. While recognizing the significance of the rate in- <br /> creases, Mr. DeBenedet noted that they were similar to those infrastructure needs being <br /> experienced across the country to maintain that critical system. <br /> Joycelyn Campbell,365 W County Road B-2 <br /> Ms. Campbell expressed her concern with the multiple increases proposed on the upcom- <br /> ing year's property taxes. As an individual living on a fixed income and struggling with <br /> the cost of living and medical expenses, Ms. Campbell expressed her concern in being <br /> able to cope with additional and high increases compiled on other expenses. Ms. Camp- <br /> bell opined that it would be hard for senior citizens to cope with all of the expenses at the <br /> same time; and asked that the City Council take that into consideration and whether <br /> something could be done to decrease them. While recognizing the need for good water <br /> and sewer services, and the services of the City's Fire and Police Departments, Ms. <br /> Campbell noted that most were no increases in income, while attempting to meet expens- <br /> es, and asked that the City Council take all those things into consideration. <br /> John Simpson, 3083 Mount Ridge Road <br /> Mr. Simpson referenced recent news stories regarding the bond issue and questioned why <br /> the City of Roseville chose not to enforce its own rules regarding any expenditures of <br /> over $3 million needing voter approval; and why this rule was bypassed. Mr. Simpson <br /> opined that it appeared that the City Council was trying to get away with something; and <br /> questioned why they were fearful of a public referendum. If the public chose not to <br /> spend that much, Mr. Simpson questioned what alternate options the City Council had. <br /> Mr. Simpson noted the significant amount of discretionary spending being proposed; and <br /> questioned how much actually needed to be done at this time; and reiterated his question <br /> on why the $3 million rule had been bypassed in the process. <br /> With no one else coming forward to speak at this time, Mayor Roe closed the Public <br /> Hearing at approximately 7:45 p.m.; and proceeded with the assistance of staff and other <br /> Councilmembers to respond to those questioned raised during public testimony. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.